favicon

T4K3.news

Trump moves on Intel stake

Officials discuss a possible government stake in Intel as part of a broader security drive

August 16, 2025 at 08:54 PM
blur Trump launches 'Manhattan Project' as one of America's largest companies set to be nationalized

A government stake in Intel is being discussed as part of a broader push to secure chip supply and reduce dependence on foreign fabs.

Trump Moves to Nationalize Intel in Broad Security Drive

Discussions are underway about a possible government stake in Intel, prompted by concerns over national security and the AI chip race. The size of any stake and the terms are not public, and Intel and the White House have not confirmed a deal. The idea comes in a context where the United States is seeking to reduce reliance on foreign fabs, particularly in Taiwan, which dominates a large share of the market.
The talks follow recent arrangements with Nvidia and AMD that involved export licenses and sales to China, highlighting pressure points in technology diplomacy. Analysts warn that state involvement could affect investor sentiment and market dynamics, while supporters argue it could strengthen US manufacturing leadership. Intel says it remains committed to American manufacturing but offered no comment on the discussions.

Key Takeaways

✔️
A government stake signals a major shift in industrial policy
✔️
The aim is to reduce dependence on foreign fabs and Taiwan
✔️
Terms and timing remain unclear
✔️
The policy intersects with US China tech diplomacy
✔️
Investor confidence could be sensitive to policy clarity
✔️
Transparency and governance will be key to public support
✔️
Recent chip export deals add complexity to the backdrop

"This is a national survival strategy in plain sight"

Attributed to MIT AI researcher Dave Blundin in coverage of the move

"If fabs move home the Taiwan question becomes central"

Blundin commenting on Taiwan dependency and fabs

"They’re putting the whole industry on a kind of war footing"

Liza Tobin discussing potential implications for the industry

The move frames technology policy as a national security matter, not just a business decision. It raises questions about how much government influence is appropriate in shaping core industries and what that means for innovation ecosystems.
If Washington proceeds cautiously with clear rules and independent oversight, it could bolster resilience. If not, it risks political backlash and chilling effects on investment, potentially widening the tech market's fault lines with China.

Highlights

  • This is a national survival strategy in plain sight
  • Onshoring chips tests America's industrial resolve
  • If fabs move home the Taiwan question becomes central
  • Transparency matters more than a secret policy shift

Political and budget risks tied to Intel stake

The proposal touches on national security, economic policy and investor confidence. It could provoke political backlash and complicate US diplomacy with China and Taiwan. Funding the stake may require new budget allocations and oversight.

Policy and markets will watch the next steps closely as the balance between security and open markets is tested.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News