favicon

T4K3.news

Wolverhampton drops wider grave premium

The council has halted plans for a 20% surcharge on 6ft graves after backlash over fairness and dignity in burial plots.

August 15, 2025 at 01:31 AM
blur Wolverhampton council rethinks plan to introduce premium on wider graves

Wolverhampton council scrapped a proposed 20 percent premium for 6ft graves after facing criticism that it was unfair

Wolverhampton council rethinks plan to introduce premium on wider graves

Wolverhampton council has halted plans to charge a 20% premium for 6ft burial plots at Danescourt cemetery after critics called the measure a fat tax and unfair. The proposal had been approved in May following discussions with 25 funeral directors, but public and professional opposition mounted and the council backed away on Thursday. Officials argued the higher fee would reflect the extra space and equipment needed for larger graves, noting that some councils already apply similar charges.

The plan raised concerns about fairness for families seeking joint plots or who fall into larger body categories, with residents labeling the move discriminatory. Funeral director Ross Hickton described the charge as a fat tax that is not acceptable or fair, while others pointed to the practical realities of cemetery space. The broader debate touched on how councils price public services when space is finite and demand remains high, and it mirrored a wider pattern where local authorities experiment with higher fees for larger burial plots across the country.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Plan faced swift backlash and was dropped
✔️
Policy linked to space and equipment costs in cemeteries
✔️
Critics framed the proposal as unfair for larger families
✔️
Cemeteries have finite space driving cost considerations
✔️
Some councils already apply wider grave charges
✔️
Public reaction can shape local budget decisions
✔️
Policy communications matter in sensitive services
✔️
Obesity data used in pricing debates remains controversial

"Someone like me who’s a bit bigger, is going to be charged more because I’m fat"

Resident Rosemarie McLaren commenting on the plan

"Fat tax and not really acceptable or fair"

Funeral director Ross Hickton on the proposed premium

"You have a finite amount of space to work with and bigger plots require more equipment"

Matthew Crawley of the Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management

The reversal shows how local policy can bend to public scrutiny. It highlights the tension between space constraints in cemeteries and the principle of equal treatment for families of all sizes. The episode also exposes how data such as obesity rates can be used to justify pricing decisions, provoking questions about proportionality and consent in local governance. In the end, the council chose caution over controversy, a move that could influence how future charges are framed and communicated to residents.

Highlights

  • A grave is not a tax bracket
  • Size should not decide dignity in burial
  • Fees for space must not hit families twice
  • Fairness matters even after life ends

Public backlash over wider grave charges

The episode shows how pricing for burial plots can touch sensitive issues of obesity, dignity, and access. Critics call it discriminatory while supporters argue it reflects space constraints. The reversal signals political pressure and a test for local governance.

The debate over fairness in local services continues to unfold beyond the grave.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News