favicon

T4K3.news

Wolverhampton cemetery adds wider grave surcharge

A 20% premium now applies to 6ft graves at Danescourt cemetery amid space and disposal cost concerns.

August 14, 2025 at 12:42 PM
blur Wolverhampton cemetery’s extra fee for wider graves criticised as ‘fat tax’

The Danescourt cemetery in Tettenhall imposes a 20% premium for 6ft graves, arguing space and disposal costs drive the price.

Wolverhampton cemetery charges wider grave surcharge amid backlash

Danescourt cemetery will charge a 20% premium for a 6ft grave, compared with the standard 5ft plot. The council says the higher price reflects the increased costs of wider graves, including disposing of extra soil. Wolverhampton records obesity levels higher than the national average, with about a third of residents affected, which the council ties to greater demand for larger plots. The authority says it consulted 25 funeral directors before the change, and only one objected.

Key Takeaways

✔️
The 20% surcharge applies to 6ft graves at Danescourt cemetery
✔️
Council cites space constraints and extra disposal costs
✔️
One in 25 funeral directors objected to the measure during consultation
✔️
Nationally, local councils vary in charges for larger graves
✔️
Policy affects couples who want to be buried together in different plots
✔️
Obesity levels in the city are cited as a driver of demand for wider graves
✔️
The issue highlights how councils balance dignity, space and budget
✔️
Transparency and ongoing public scrutiny are likely
✔️
There are alternatives for bereaved families when space is tight

"Fat tax on graves is heavy to bear"

Reaction from a local funeral director

"You have a finite amount of space to work with and this needs to be accounted for"

Explanation from space and cost experts

"While space allows families will still be able to place larger coffins at the end of existing rows at no extra cost"

Policy note from the council

"Many other local councils charge higher fees for larger graves"

National comparison cited in the article

The move tests how a city balances limited burial space with fairness for families. It raises questions about dignity and cost in end of life matters, especially when budgets are tight. Critics say the policy could hit low‑income families hardest, while supporters point to space management and safety costs. The broader trend in the UK shows a patchwork approach, with some councils charging more for larger plots and others absorbing the cost.

Highlights

  • Fat tax on graves is heavy to bear
  • Space has a price on the city
  • Dignity costs more when space runs out
  • Policy must be clear and fair

Backlash risk over burial size surcharge

The policy targets families and raises questions about fairness, dignity, and budget transparency. It could invite public scrutiny, political reaction, or controversy.

The debate over burial costs mirrors broader questions about how cities value community spaces and the needs of ordinary families.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News