favicon

T4K3.news

Wolverhampton faces backlash over wider burial plots price hike

Council charges more for 6ft burial plots at Danescourt cemetery, drawing mixed reaction from residents and funeral directors.

August 14, 2025 at 09:11 AM
blur Criticism of Wolverhampton burial 'fat tax' at council cemetery

A Wolverhampton council introduces higher fees for 6ft burial plots at Danescourt cemetery, drawing criticism from residents and funeral directors.

Wolverhampton faces backlash over wider burial plots price hike

At Danescourt cemetery in Tettenhall, the city council has opened a 6ft burial plot section. The price for a wider plot is 2700 pounds, a 20 percent rise from a standard 5ft grave. Officials say the extra space and the disposal of additional soil add cost, and they point to local obesity rates being higher than the national average. The council notes that wider plot charges are not unique to Wolverhampton and are found in nearby authorities.

Residents and funeral directors have voiced strong criticism. Critics describe the move as discrimination and a financial burden for families, especially in deprived areas. The council says it consulted with 25 funeral directors; ten responded, with one objection. The plan also offers options, such as placing larger coffins at the end of existing rows at no extra cost, and the council argues the policy helps manage cemetery space without turning people away.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Wolverhampton introduces a 6ft burial plot section with a 2700 pound price
✔️
The increase is 20 percent compared with standard 5ft graves
✔️
Residents and funeral directors accuse the move of discrimination and added financial strain
✔️
Council cites space and disposal costs along with higher local obesity rates
✔️
Consultation with funeral directors produced limited objections
✔️
Some opposition suggests more transparent public engagement is needed
✔️
Other local authorities use similar charges, signaling a broader trend
✔️
Councils offer options like end-of-row placement at no extra charge
✔️
The policy tests how dignity, space and cost are balanced in bereavement services
✔️
Public reaction will shape future bereavement policy decisions

"Essentially it's a fat tax"

Funeral director Ross Hickton calling the charge

"Discrimination, it's not acceptable"

Resident Rosemarie McLaren on the policy

"You have a finite amount of space to work with"

Matthew Crawley of the Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management

"There’s a lot of obesity these days"

Local resident Russell Smallman on the issue

The case highlights a clash between practical space management and fairness to families facing bereavement costs. Framing the charge around obesity risks painting the issue in moral terms while ignoring broader financial pressures on households. The policy invites scrutiny of how councils communicate and implement cost increases that touch personal loss.

If more councils follow this model, the public will judge whether higher fees for larger plots improve services or deepen inequality. The outcome may hinge on how well authorities explain costs and protect vulnerable families from financial hardship while maintaining cemetery capacity.

Highlights

  • Dignity should be free from extra charges
  • Size should not decide a price at a grave
  • Fairness must outlast budget pressures in bereavement services
  • Space constraints demand thoughtful policy not easy blame

Budget and backlash risk over wider burial plot charges

The policy touches on budget pressures, public reaction and potential political backlash. If not handled with care, it could create controversy and affect trust in local services.

Policy debates like this test how communities balance space, dignity and cost

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News