favicon

T4K3.news

Trump backs 10 percent Intel stake plan

The administration signals a plan to buy a 10% non voting stake in Intel as part of CHIPS Act funding, with Bernie Sanders expressing support.

August 20, 2025 at 06:00 PM
blur Trump confirms US is seeking 10% stake in Intel. Bernie Sanders approves.

The administration signals a plan to acquire a non voting stake in Intel as part of CHIPS Act funding, drawing cross party attention.

Trump backs 10 percent Intel stake plan

The administration confirmed a plan to acquire a 10 percent stake in Intel as part of CHIPS Act funding. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the government would disburse CHIPS grants only after securing non voting shares, a move designed to let taxpayers benefit from any profits without giving the government voting rights. Leavitt described the idea as a creative approach to protect national and economic security.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Government links CHIPS Act grants to equity stakes in chipmakers
✔️
Non voting shares are used to avoid governance control
✔️
Sanders supports the plan, highlighting a cross partisanship shift
✔️
Intel is in talks; other CHIPS recipients have not commented
✔️
Possible grant clawbacks if deals do not materialize
✔️
Plan raises questions about governance and taxpayer protections
✔️
Risk of setting a precedent for future public-private equity deals

"If microchip companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the taxpayers of America have a right to a reasonable return on that investment,"

Sanders on taxpayer profits from CHIPS grants

"creative idea that has never been done before"

Leavitt on the plan’s novelty and purpose

"any potential arrangement wouldn’t provide the government with voting or governance rights in Intel"

Lutnick on governance rights

The move tests a new twist in CHIPS Act policy, blending government subsidies with equity participation. It could offer taxpayers upside if chipmakers thrive, but it also blurs the line between aid and investment and invites scrutiny over governance and disclosure. Cross party support from Sanders suggests a broader appetite for industrial policy linked to market outcomes. If this approach expands, it could set a precedent that future administrations use equity thresholds to steer public funds, with lasting implications for transparency and investor confidence.

Highlights

  • Taxpayers deserve a return on their investment
  • A creative idea that has never been done before
  • Non voting stakes change the risk profile without control
  • Public money in private firms invites new questions about accountability

Budget and political risk loom over equity plan

The proposal ties public grants to private equity, raising questions about accountability, governance, and potential backlash among taxpayers and lawmakers.

Policy choices like this will shape how government supports tech innovation in the years ahead.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News