favicon

T4K3.news

Trump encourages Coca-Cola to switch to cane sugar

President Trump pushes Coca-Cola to stop using corn syrup in favor of cane sugar, worrying corn producers.

July 17, 2025 at 07:26 PM
blur Trump's cane sugar Coca-Cola push could disrupt U.S. agriculture: trade group

Farmers express concern over President Trump's proposal for Coca-Cola to switch to cane sugar.

Trump's push for cane sugar in Coca-Cola could threaten U.S. corn producers

U.S. corn producers are worried about President Donald Trump’s initiative for Coca-Cola to replace corn syrup with cane sugar. On Wednesday, Trump stated on social media that he discussed using cane sugar with Coca-Cola, which currently uses high-fructose corn syrup. Industry leaders, including those from the Corn Refiners Association, believe this change could harm the corn farming sector and lead to job losses in food manufacturing. Coca-Cola has not confirmed the switch, but it defended corn syrup’s nutritional value. Experts point out that while corn syrup production is a small part of the entire corn industry, a switch could still have widespread implications, particularly for processors like Archer-Daniels-Midland. The move may also signify a cultural shift spurred by the growing ‘Make America Healthy Again’ campaign, which targets processed foods.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Trump's initiative could alter sweetener dynamics in the U.S.
✔️
Corn producers express fear about job loss and income decline.
✔️
Coca-Cola's change might reflect shifting public health priorities.
✔️
The corn lobby remains a powerful force against such changes.

"Replacing high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar doesn’t make sense."

John Bode, CEO of Corn Refiners Association, highlights the potential job losses associated with this change.

"There’s clearly a growing consumer backlash against food additives."

Scott Irwin discusses the influence of the MAHA movement on public perception of food ingredients.

"It’s just going to be trying to walk that tightrope throughout this administration."

Scott Irwin reflects on the balance between Trump's agriculture policies and consumer health demands.

The implications of Trump's directive extend beyond individual products. By aiming to replace corn syrup with cane sugar, he risks damaging relationships with key agricultural sectors that form a significant part of his support base. The decision may also reflect broader trends affecting U.S. food policy, as the administration responds to public sentiments about health and nutrition. This initiative echoes the struggles of maintaining balance between modern consumer demands and the historically entrenched practices of American agriculture.

Highlights

  • Changing a beloved recipe could hurt many farmers in the U.S.
  • A simple swap of sweeteners may reshape agricultural futures.
  • Corn syrup has become a symbol of a larger food landscape shift.
  • This initiative brings to light the power struggle in food policy.

Proposed sugar switch raises significant risks for corn producers

Trump's push for Coca-Cola to adopt cane sugar could disrupt the corn industry, impacting farmers and jobs. This creates potential backlash from agricultural sectors that are critical to the economy.

As discussions continue, the balance between agriculture and consumer health remains a contentious topic.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News