favicon

T4K3.news

Newsmax settles defamation suit with Dominion

Newsmax will pay Dominion 67 million to settle defamation claims over 2020 election coverage, avoiding a trial.

August 18, 2025 at 08:53 PM
blur Newsmax to pay $67M to settle defamation lawsuit from voting machine company

Newsmax will pay Dominion 67 million to settle defamation claims over 2020 election coverage, avoiding a trial without an apology or retraction.

Newsmax settles defamation suit with Dominion for 67 million

The settlement shows Newsmax will pay Dominion Voting Systems 67 million in three installments by January 2027, ending a high profile defamation lawsuit tied to claims that the 2020 election was rigged. Newsmax said it believes it acted within professional standards, while Dominion welcomed the resolution through a regulatory filing. The agreement avoids a public trial and the courtroom drama that could have followed.

Earlier in the case, Dominion alleged that Newsmax manufactured and broadcast false claims about fraud and kickbacks. The matter has already seen related actions, including Dominion’s $787.5 million settlement with Fox News in 2023 and Newsmax’s prior 40 million settlement with Smartmatic. A Delaware judge previously ruled Newsmax had defamed Dominion, but a jury must determine whether the conduct involved actual malice.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Dominion receives 67 million in a three‑installment settlement
✔️
Newsmax avoids apology or retraction as part of the deal
✔️
Settlement prevents a high‑profile defamation trial
✔️
Newsmax previously settled with Smartmatic for 40 million
✔️
Dominion also settled with Fox News for 787.5 million in 2023
✔️
The cases highlight legal risk for media when election claims are disputed

"We are pleased to have settled this matter."

Dominion's response to the settlement agreement.

"We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism."

Newsmax's response to the settlement.

"believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020."

Newsmax's stated reason for coverage in the settlement context.

This settlement underscores the rising cost of spreading election misinformation and the growing willingness of courts to hold media outlets financially responsible. It also reflects how financial consequences can shape newsroom risk and decision making, even when outlets claim they were pursuing balanced coverage. The absence of an apology or retraction in the deal signals a boundary line between accountability and public messaging that some readers will interpret as a compromise on credulity. As other outlets face similar legal exposure, the episode tests how much pressure the sector will tolerate before coverage shifts toward caution rather than confrontation.

Highlights

  • We are pleased to have settled this matter.
  • believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020.
  • We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism.
  • Settlement avoids a high-profile trial

Defamation settlement signals political and legal risk for media

The agreement spotlights ongoing concerns about misinformation and accountability in political reporting, with potential public reaction and investor scrutiny across conservative media outlets.

The price of unchecked claims is rising in public life.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News