favicon

T4K3.news

Macrons sue Candace Owens for defamation

Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron have sued Candace Owens for spreading false claims about them.

July 23, 2025 at 04:56 PM
blur French president and wife sue rightwing US commentator Candace Owens for defamation

The Macrons seek justice over Owens' claims about their identities and relationship.

Macrons file defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens for false claims

Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron have initiated a defamation lawsuit against US commentator Candace Owens, claiming she has made damaging statements about them. Filed in Delaware, the suit asserts that Owens has continually spread falsehoods for personal gain. Among her allegations is a claim that Brigitte Macron is a man, alongside baseless accusations involving incest and CIA control. The couple argues that despite multiple requests for retraction, Owens has instead mocked them, contributing to a global campaign of humiliation. Reports indicate the Macrons have incurred substantial legal costs to defend their reputations. They are prepared to take this matter to court, supported by a reputable law firm with a track record in similar cases. Owens has expressed her intent to resist the lawsuit, framing it as an attack on free speech.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Macrons allege ongoing defamation from Candace Owens.
✔️
Lawsuit filed in Delaware seeks to address false claims about their identities.
✔️
Owens reportedly escalated falsehoods despite multiple retraction requests.
✔️
The couple faces global humiliation and legal expenses due to the false narratives.
✔️
Owens' claims tap into broader misogynistic trends against women in politics.
✔️
This lawsuit may redefine media accountability for public figures.

"Ms Owens' campaign of defamation was plainly designed to harass and cause pain to us and our families."

The Macrons explain the impact of Owens' allegations on their lives.

"This is a foreign government attacking the first amendment rights of an American independent journalist."

Owens positions the lawsuit as a threat to free speech.

"Every time the Macrons leave their home, they do so knowing that countless people have heard these vile fabrications."

The lawsuit details the emotional toll on the Macrons due to false claims.

"These narratives tap into the trope of the duplicitous woman, implying that transgender individuals are inherently deceptive."

A report examines the societal implications of Owens' claims about Brigitte Macron.

This lawsuit underscores the growing tension between public figures and media personalities, particularly in the age of social media where false narratives can quickly become widespread. The Macrons’ pursuit of legal action reflects their need to confront what they describe as a systematic harassment campaign, elevating debates on freedom of speech against the necessity to combat misinformation. Owens' stance highlights the polarizing nature of contemporary journalism, where sensational claims can overshadow factual reporting. Furthermore, this case could set a precedent for how public figures respond to defamatory statements in the digital age, potentially reshaping the landscape of media accountability.

Highlights

  • Defamation lawsuits highlight the clash between fame and falsehoods.
  • Public figures grapple with the cost of their reputations in the digital age.
  • Misinformation can turn lives into fodder for profit-driven lies.
  • Every claim against the Macrons is a campaign of global humiliation.

Concerns over public reaction and political implications

The lawsuit may provoke backlash from supporters of Owens and raise questions about media freedom.

The outcome of this high-profile case could influence how any public figure addresses defamatory content online.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News