favicon

T4K3.news

Newsmax Settles Dominion Case for 67 Million

Newsmax has settled the Dominion defamation case for 67 million dollars, ending the trial that was due to begin in October.

August 18, 2025 at 10:07 PM
blur Newsmax settles Dominion election defamation case for $67m

Dominion sued Newsmax for defamation over 2020 election coverage and Newsmax settled for 67 million.

Newsmax Settles Dominion Defamation Case for 67 Million

Newsmax has agreed to pay 67 million dollars to Dominion in a defamation settlement in Delaware. Dominion had accused the network of broadcasting verifiably false lies after Joe Biden won the 2020 election, causing what it described as devastating economic harm. A trial was set to begin in October, and a Delaware judge had already ruled Newsmax defamed Dominion, while a jury would decide on malice and damages if the case had gone to trial.

Newsmax said it settled because it believed the proceedings were unfair and that the judge’s rulings had favored the plaintiffs from the start. The network argued it stood by its election coverage and urged the public to hear both sides of the disputes. Dominion welcomed the settlement, while noting it pursued similar actions against other networks. The case follows related disputes, including Smartmatic’s prior settlement with Newsmax and a much larger award against Fox News in 2023 over similar claims."

Key Takeaways

✔️
Settlement amount of 67 million shifts liability costs for election coverage
✔️
Judge had ruled Newsmax defamed Dominion before trial
✔️
Case highlights ongoing legal risk for media outlets in political reporting
✔️
Newsmax cites due process concerns as a reason for settlement
✔️
Dominion pursued multiple lawsuits against major networks
✔️
Similar cases have seen substantial settlements and large damages
✔️
Outlets may tighten fact checking to avoid costly lawsuits
✔️
The momentum in defamation cases raises questions about media accountability

"From the very beginning, Judge Davis ruled in ways that strongly favored the plaintiffs and limited Newsmax's ability to defend itself."

Newsmax statement about trial fairness and judicial rulings

"It believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes"

Newsmax defense of its coverage

"verifiably false lies"

Dominion's accusation in the filing

"This is about accountability for election coverage"

Editorial takeaway

The settlement signals that large political coverage comes with real legal risks for media outlets, even those on the right. It underscores that claims of misinformation can lead to meaningful costs and force a pause in aggressive post-election narratives. The outcome may push outlets to tighten fact checking and curb risky rhetoric about election integrity, especially as investors, lawmakers, and audiences demand greater accountability.

At the same time, the decision leaves room for ongoing debate about what counts as defamation and about due process in politically charged cases. Newsmax frames the settlement as a step back from a fair trial, while Dominion frames it as accountability for harmful claims. The broader pattern includes high-profile settlements from other networks, hinting at a trend where the economics of misinformation increasingly shapes press coverage of elections.

Highlights

  • News comes with a price tag for misinformation
  • A settlement is a verdict in disguise
  • Media liability is no longer theoretical
  • Defamation cases shape how outlets talk about elections

Political and Public Backlash Risk

The case ties to the 2020 election narrative and could invite ongoing political scrutiny and investor attention. The settlement may intensify backlash against media outlets that cover elections aggressively and influence future newsroom risk management.

Readers should watch how courts balance free speech with accountability in a new era of election coverage.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News