T4K3.news
Newsmax Settles Dominion Case for 67 Million
Newsmax has settled the Dominion defamation case for 67 million dollars, ending the trial that was due to begin in October.

Dominion sued Newsmax for defamation over 2020 election coverage and Newsmax settled for 67 million.
Newsmax Settles Dominion Defamation Case for 67 Million
Newsmax has agreed to pay 67 million dollars to Dominion in a defamation settlement in Delaware. Dominion had accused the network of broadcasting verifiably false lies after Joe Biden won the 2020 election, causing what it described as devastating economic harm. A trial was set to begin in October, and a Delaware judge had already ruled Newsmax defamed Dominion, while a jury would decide on malice and damages if the case had gone to trial.
Newsmax said it settled because it believed the proceedings were unfair and that the judge’s rulings had favored the plaintiffs from the start. The network argued it stood by its election coverage and urged the public to hear both sides of the disputes. Dominion welcomed the settlement, while noting it pursued similar actions against other networks. The case follows related disputes, including Smartmatic’s prior settlement with Newsmax and a much larger award against Fox News in 2023 over similar claims."
Key Takeaways
"From the very beginning, Judge Davis ruled in ways that strongly favored the plaintiffs and limited Newsmax's ability to defend itself."
Newsmax statement about trial fairness and judicial rulings
"It believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes"
Newsmax defense of its coverage
"verifiably false lies"
Dominion's accusation in the filing
"This is about accountability for election coverage"
Editorial takeaway
The settlement signals that large political coverage comes with real legal risks for media outlets, even those on the right. It underscores that claims of misinformation can lead to meaningful costs and force a pause in aggressive post-election narratives. The outcome may push outlets to tighten fact checking and curb risky rhetoric about election integrity, especially as investors, lawmakers, and audiences demand greater accountability.
At the same time, the decision leaves room for ongoing debate about what counts as defamation and about due process in politically charged cases. Newsmax frames the settlement as a step back from a fair trial, while Dominion frames it as accountability for harmful claims. The broader pattern includes high-profile settlements from other networks, hinting at a trend where the economics of misinformation increasingly shapes press coverage of elections.
Highlights
- News comes with a price tag for misinformation
- A settlement is a verdict in disguise
- Media liability is no longer theoretical
- Defamation cases shape how outlets talk about elections
Political and Public Backlash Risk
The case ties to the 2020 election narrative and could invite ongoing political scrutiny and investor attention. The settlement may intensify backlash against media outlets that cover elections aggressively and influence future newsroom risk management.
Readers should watch how courts balance free speech with accountability in a new era of election coverage.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Newsmax settlement with Dominion

Newsmax settles Dominion defamation suit for 67 million

Dominion Newsmax settlement reached

Newsmax settles Dominion defamation case for 67 million

Newsmax settles defamation suit with Dominion

Ellen DeGeneres moves to the UK

XRP nears new highs after legal victory

Shannon Sharpe settles $50-million lawsuit
