favicon

T4K3.news

CFP expansion under study

The Big Ten is weighing a 24 to 28 team playoff model that would also end conference title games.

August 16, 2025 at 04:45 PM
blur Big Ten Pondering A College Football Playoff with 24 or 28 Teams

The Big Ten explores a large CFP expansion that would remove conference championship games and add many automatic bids.

Big Ten Pushes a 24 to 28 Team CFP Expansion

The Big Ten has discussed expanding the College Football Playoff to 24 or 28 teams, a move that would also drop conference championship games. The plan is still in the very early stages, but leaked details show seven automatic bids for the Big Ten and SEC in the 28-team format, five for the ACC and Big 12, and two automatic bids for Group of Five teams plus two at-large bids. The CFP would seed the field and decide hosting for first-round games, potentially moving some matchups to home stadiums.

In the 28-team model, playoff games on campuses would rise from four to as many as 20. The Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti has shared the two larger models with the conference and began circulating them to other leagues. Other conferences are backing different approaches for a 16-team playoff, underscoring the lack of consensus on how to balance tradition with revenue and competition.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Expanding to 24 or 28 teams is being explored by the Big Ten
✔️
Conference championship games could be eliminated in a larger format
✔️
Automatic bids would concentrate more spots with major leagues
✔️
There is no single model; conferences favor different approaches
✔️
Hosting decisions would be made by the CFP committee
✔️
The process faces scheduling, financial, and public reaction challenges

"the idea is still in the very early stages"

describing the status of the expansion

"the 28-team model features seven automatic bids for the Big Ten and SEC"

detail cited in the reporting

"other conferences have backed different approaches"

illustrating a split in the sport

"this plan could reshape how teams chase the title"

editorial reflection on impact

Editor’s note: the debate is as much about money as it is about the game. A bigger playoff could broaden markets and TV rights, but it would also complicate schedules, travel, and the status of the regular season. The idea risks diluting conference crowns and turning the chase for a title into a longer, less climactic affair. If the field grows, who benefits and who bears the costs will matter as much as the format itself.

The divergence among conferences highlights a broader tension inside college sports. The push for a massive playoff reflects a business model built on volume and exposure, not just prestige. The path to agreement depends on reconciling calendars, player welfare, and public sentiment with a shared sense of fairness and tradition.

Highlights

  • More teams, more markets, more questions.
  • If you widen the field, you widen the stakes.
  • Power brokers chase trophies in a bigger arena.
  • A larger playoff reshapes calendars and culture.

Playoff expansion faces budget and backlash risks

Expanding the playoff to 24 or 28 teams could strain scheduling, increase travel, raise costs for conferences, and trigger public and political backlash. The lack of consensus among conferences raises the risk of extended negotiations and unequal benefits.

The next phase will test how much fans value tradition against the lure of bigger TV audiences.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News