favicon

T4K3.news

Venmo gambling claims surface around Mateer

Screenshots from 2022 circulate online alleging Mateer sent money for sports betting; no official confirmation yet.

August 12, 2025 at 03:56 AM
blur John Mateer's alleged Venmo activity surfaces: Did Oklahoma QB pay Landon Roaten for sports gambling?

Allegations on social media claim a 2022 Venmo payment connected to sports betting involving Oklahoma quarterback John Mateer, but no verification exists.

Oklahoma QB Mateer Faces Viral Venmo Gambling Allegations

Screenshots circulating on social media purport to show Oklahoma Sooners quarterback John Mateer making Venmo payments in 2022 to a person identified as Richard Langdon, reportedly linked to former Washington State teammate Landon Roaten. The posts reference betting on UCLA versus USC and a generic note about sports gambling. The images have since been deleted and there is no official confirmation from Mateer, Oklahoma, or the NCAA.

The NCAA prohibits betting on games by college athletes. If verified, the claims could lead to disciplinary action, including suspension. The origin of the posts lies with Barstool Longhorn, a rival account in college football circles, which added that the screenshots are easily found on Venmo, then shared the claim further online. No formal investigation or statement has been issued yet, underscoring the gap between social media rumor and verified fact.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Unverified social media claims circulated about Mateer and Venmo payments
✔️
Screenshots have been removed, leaving verification uncertain
✔️
NCAA rules ban gambling on NCAA events by student athletes
✔️
A rival account helped propel the spread of the claim
✔️
Disciplinary outcomes hinge on confirmed evidence and official statements
✔️
Due process and careful reporting are essential in athlete allegations

"Verification beats speculation every time."

Editorial stance on evidence and due process.

"A single screenshot does not prove a case."

A reminder about evidentiary standards.

"Due process should guide any action against a student athlete."

Principle for handling unverified allegations.

This episode highlights how quickly online chatter can shape a narrative, especially when it involves a high-profile athlete. The risk is not just reputational damage but potential consequences for a program that must balance fan interest with due process. In the absence of confirmation, readers should demand verifiable evidence before drawing conclusions. The episode also raises questions about the responsibility of rival accounts and the speed of amplification that can mislead fans and even influence recruiting conversations.

Highlights

  • Verification beats speculation every time.
  • A single screenshot does not prove a case.
  • Rumors move faster than the truth on social media.
  • Due process should guide any action against a student athlete.

Potential discipline and reputational risk

Unverified social media claims about a student athlete could harm Mateer’s reputation and trigger investigations if proven, heightening the chance of misinformation spreading.

The truth will matter more than online chatter.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News