favicon

T4K3.news

Mateer Venmo notes draw scrutiny at OU

Oklahoma quarterback John Mateer faces questions after Venmo notes referenced sports betting and a school response

August 13, 2025 at 06:47 PM
blur Colin Cowherd believes John Mateer's defense of Venmo scandal: 'I even get it and I'm a dad'

A social media finding about John Mateer’s Venmo notes referenced sports betting and drew reactions from fans, media figures, and Oklahoma officials.

OU quarterback Mateer faces scrutiny over Venmo transactions

Two 2022 Venmo transactions linked to Mateer when he played for Washington State listed sports gambling in the payment description. Mateer has denied wagering, calling the notes an inside joke and saying he has never bet on a sport.
Colin Cowherd defended the explanation on his show, suggesting Venmo notes can be a running gag among friends. Oklahoma’s athletic department stated there is no known NCAA investigation and noted it uses ProhiBet to monitor gambling activity. Mateer remains set to start for Oklahoma on Aug 30 against Illinois State.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Mateer faces a reputational question rather than a proven violation
✔️
OU denies any NCAA investigation and cites monitoring tools
✔️
Media commentary frames Venmo notes as common but potentially risky
✔️
Public perception hinges on how quickly schools provide clarity
✔️
The incident tests OU’s communication strategy ahead of the season
✔️
Education and transparency around gambling rules are likely to intensify
✔️
Starting quarterback status remains intact for now
✔️
The case could influence how similar rumors are handled in college sports

"I Venmo once in a while and I got kids that Venmo and they make jokes"

Cowherd describing Venmo as a running gag

"It’s like a running gag on Venmo that you put in somehow why you need the money"

Cowherd on why people use Venmo notes

"As a quarterback, I would not joke"

Cowherd distinguishing how seriousness varies by role

"OU Athletics provides ongoing education to its student athletes coaches and staff on matters related to sports gambling"

OU statement on monitoring and education

The episode highlights how casual online behavior can collide with strict rules in college sports. It also shows how media voices can shape the narrative, framing a personal joke as harmless in the context of a high-profile player.Schools face pressure to balance transparency with athlete privacy, while ensuring clear education on gambling rules. These threads could influence how OU communicates during the season and how the NCAA views similar cases in the future.
Public reaction exposes both admiration for athletes and impatience with ambiguity. The risk is that speculation grows faster than confirmed facts, potentially harming a player’s reputation before any formal review starts.

Highlights

  • I Venmo once in a while and I got kids that Venmo and they make jokes
  • It’s like a running gag on Venmo that you put in somehow why you need the money
  • As a quarterback, I would not joke
  • OU Athletics provides ongoing education to its student athletes coaches and staff on matters related to sports gambling

Gambling scrutiny and public reaction at OU

The case touches NCAA rules, athlete reputation, and public perception, with potential scheduling pressures and reputation risks before any formal review. Active discussion online could influence expectations and demand clearer institutional responses.

The season will test how quickly institutions can translate caution into clear, fair narratives.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News