T4K3.news
VAR decision shocks Premier League rivals
Eze's goal was ruled out after a VAR review for encroachment at Stamford Bridge, sparking debate over officiating and the season's rhythm.

Eberechi Eze's free-kick was ruled out after a VAR review for encroachment, sparking debate over the rule and officiating.
Major Premier League controversy as VAR strikes in Chelsea vs Crystal Palace
Crystal Palace forward Eberechi Eze thought he had given Palace the lead at Stamford Bridge with a stunning free kick. The goal was ruled out after a VAR check led by referee Darren England. The reason was encroachment by Palace defender Marc Guehi on the Chelsea wall in the build-up, making the shot an indirect free kick and the goal disallowed. The decision was explained to the crowd after review, and Chelsea’s set-piece coach Bernardo Cueva was seen arguing with the fourth official. Pundits and players weighed in, with some arguing the call was harsh while others defended the letter of the rule.
Off the field, the moment feeds into transfer chatter around the Eagles’ Eze. Tottenham Hotspur have been linked with a big-money bid, and the result adds a new layer to negotiations as clubs weigh performance, value, and timing. Eze, who had been expected to miss the trip, started the match, intensifying talk about his future. The episode also raises questions about how consistently encroachment rules will be applied across games, especially as managers prepare for upcoming fixtures and key set-piece routines. Chelsea now faces a tight schedule with a London derby against West Ham soon and a European tie later in the week.
Key Takeaways
"After review, away number six is less than one metre away from the wall as the shot is taken."
Official explanation of the decision
"There are times when you ask in football where you ask if something is right or wrong, and that just seems mighty harsh."
Chris Sutton on Sky Sports
"How many times have we seen that blocking so if that is the precedent set on the opening weekend it has to stay for the season."
Steve Sidwell on the decision
The ruling underscores how modern rules and video review can alter outcomes in an instant. Encroachment on a defensive wall is an issue that rarely decides games, yet it did here, prompting debate over whether officials are applying the rule with enough consistency. The discussion extends beyond one match to the broader question of how stricter enforcement affects attackers and defenders, and whether the law serves the game or complicates it. The incident also reveals how business and sport intersect in football, with transfer interest in Eze adding a commercial layer to a moment that fans may remember for years.
Highlights
- Encroachment can erase a goal in a blink
- The wall rule can sting the attacker even when the ball is perfect
- One decision on opening weekend can shape the season
- Officials must balance rule precision with game flow
Officiating controversy and potential backlash
The decision at Stamford Bridge highlights ongoing tensions around encroachment rules and how they are enforced. It could influence how clubs plan set-pieces and how fans perceive refereeing decisions, potentially feeding into public reaction and ongoing controversy.
Officiating is a shared responsibility between referees and regulators, and the season will be watched closely.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Record Spending Defines a High Stakes Premier League Season

Chelsea take early lead in Premier League race

Referee decision disallows Eze goal in Chelsea draw

Manchester United gears up for summer transfer clear-out

Chelsea stumble at home as Palace win

Gibbs-White renews contract with Nottingham Forest

New Premier League rules outlined

Premier League VAR changes underway
