T4K3.news
Referee decision disallows Eze goal in Chelsea draw
Eberechi Eze's free-kick was ruled out after VAR review, leaving Chelsea and Palace level at Stamford Bridge

Eberechi Eze's free-kick was ruled out after a VAR check, leaving Chelsea and Crystal Palace level at Stamford Bridge
Referee decision disallows Eze goal in Chelsea draw with Palace
Chelsea and Crystal Palace played to a goalless draw at Stamford Bridge after Eberechi Eze's free-kick was ruled out following a VAR check. James Bell signalled for a pitchside review and Darren England overturned the on field decision when it was found Marc Guehi was too close to the Chelsea wall. The incident kept the match scoreless in the opening Premier League game of the season.
The Premier League match centre later explained that the goal was disallowed because Guehi was less than a metre from the wall when the shot was taken, making it an indirect free kick. Former referee Chris Foy supported the process, saying the rule aims to tidy up a crowded wall and reduce ambiguity in this kind of set piece.
Key Takeaways
"This was a really good decision but it caused a lot of noise"
Foy on the decision's reception
"The law says if there are three or more players for the wall attackers must be one metre away"
Rule explanation
"People don’t like it but there is an acceptance it was the right call"
Public reception
"VAR checks bring clarity even under noisy conditions"
Process and transparency
This moment shows how the wall rule and VAR work together in real time. The one metre distance rule is meant to stop attackers from exploiting crowded walls, but it can create moments that are hard to judge from the sideline. Officials must explain their calls quickly to keep the game moving and maintain trust.
Fans and teams will watch how this decision influences future set pieces. If such calls become more common, clubs may adjust how they train walls and how attackers position themselves, which could change the tempo of league games and the feel of early-season matches.
Highlights
- This was a really good decision but it caused a lot of noise
- The law says if there are three or more players for the wall attackers must be one metre away
- People don’t like it but there is an acceptance it was the right call
- VAR checks bring clarity even under noisy conditions
Refereeing decision sparks debate over wall rules
The disallowed goal after a VAR review has reignited discussion about how the three-man wall rule is enforced and how quickly officials explain such calls. This incident may influence future set piece planning and fan perceptions of fairness.
The season will test how consistently these checks are applied across teams and venues
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Chelsea held by Palace in opening day

Chelsea and Palace share the points after VAR call

VAR review prompts calls for clearer rules

Chelsea stumble at home as Palace win

VAR decision shocks Premier League rivals

Chelsea held to draw with Palace

Sanchez explains Chelsea's struggle against Palace

Premier League weekend recap
