T4K3.news

Three Super League clubs vote against expansion

Hull FC, Hull KR, and Wigan Warriors oppose the league's expansion plan for 2026.

July 28, 2025 at 06:45 PM

The three clubs who did not vote for Super League expansion revealed

Three Super League clubs chose not to support the proposal for expansion in 2026.

Three Super League clubs oppose expansion plan for 2026

Super League leaders Hull KR, Wigan Warriors, and Hull FC have become the three clubs that did not support the proposal to expand the league to 14 teams by 2026. A total of nine clubs voted in favor of the expansion after discussions led by Nigel Wood at AMT Headingley. Hull FC expressed strong opposition to the expansion, arguing for a reduction in the league size instead. Hull KR indicated a willingness to consider expansion for 2027, while Wigan Warriors abstained from the vote entirely. This move comes amid concerns regarding fixture simplicity and potential financial implications regarding broadcast deals, especially with the involvement of French teams.

Key Takeaways

✔️

Hull FC opposes expansion, advocating for a smaller league.

✔️

Hull KR is open to future discussions about expansion.

✔️

Wigan Warriors abstained from voting on the proposal.

✔️

Nine clubs voted in favor of moving to 14 teams by 2026.

✔️

Concerns about revenue and broadcasting deals influence decisions.

✔️

The dynamics between clubs reflect varying visions for Super League's future.

"Hull's objection was clear and categorical."

This highlights Hull FC's strong opposition to expansion.

"Clubs believe that will promote bigger revenue on match-day."

This reflects the rationale behind supporting expansion.

"Rovers believed expansion came too soon this time."

This shows Hull KR’s cautious approach towards quick changes.

"Fears have now disappeared regarding broadcasting concerns."

This indicates a shift in the mindset of clubs about expansion risks.

The refusal by Hull KR, Wigan Warriors, and Hull FC to support the Super League expansion highlights the growing divide among clubs regarding the future direction of the league. While some clubs see expansion as a path to increased revenue through simplified fixtures and eliminated repeat matches, others are wary of the risks associated with potentially lower match-day revenues and the impact on broadcasting deals. As more clubs push for expansion, the worries of established teams like Hull FC and Hull KR could set a precedent for future discussions about league structure and competitive fairness.

Highlights

Hull FC's stance shows a preference for a leaner league.
A divide emerges as clubs push for different futures.
The expansion debate reveals deep financial fears.
Abstaining from a vote can speak volumes.

Potential financial repercussions from Super League expansion

The clubs' opposition to expansion raises concerns about revenue and broadcasting deals, especially with potential changes in league structure affecting financial stability. Hull FC's strong stance reflects a deeper apprehension about competition fairness and economic impact.

The outcome of this voting will shape the future of Super League.

🏷️

rugby superleague hullfc wigansuperleague sportseconomics sports business

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!