Sicily bridge plan moves forward despite protests

Thousands in Messina protest a government plan to connect Sicily with the mainland by a 13.5 billion euro bridge, even as officials push ahead with the project.

Sicily bridge plan sparks protests as government pushes ahead

In Messina, thousands gathered on the weekend to oppose a government plan to build a 13.5-billion-euro bridge that would connect Sicily to mainland Italy. Organizers estimated about 10,000 participants, while authorities offered different tallies. Critics cite the project’s scale, earthquake risk, environmental impact and potential mafia involvement as major concerns. The plan moved forward after a government committee approved it this week, signaling continued political backing. Transport Minister Matteo Salvini has described the project as the biggest infrastructure undertaking in the West, arguing it could generate jobs and unlock broader road and rail improvements in southern Italy. Critics warn of social costs, including the expropriation of roughly 500 families, and question whether promised gains will materialize.

The bridge would span nearly 3.7 kilometers, with a long suspended section that would make it one of the longest bridges in the world. If built, ferry crossing times could drop from as long as 100 minutes to about 10 minutes by car, while rail travel would also be shortened. The government frames the project as protection against security risks by creating a strategic corridor for rapid movement of troops and equipment, tying infrastructure to defense policy. Environmental groups have petitioned the EU over potential impacts on migratory birds, and Italy’s president has urged that anti-mafia safeguards apply to the project. Preliminary work could begin this autumn, with full construction planned for 2026 and a completion target between 2032 and 2033. The idea has resurfaced several times since 1969, most recently under Premier Giorgia Meloni's administration.

Economically, the plan is a high-stakes bet that mixes regional development with national security framing. Backers point to jobs and growth, but the large price tag and long timeline raise questions about financing, maintenance costs and long-term demand. The defense narrative broadens political appeal but also widens scrutiny over who benefits and who bears the costs. Public trust hinges on clear safeguards against corruption and on credible plans to protect communities and ecosystems.

Public sentiment is deeply divided. Protests highlight worries about local disruption and environmental harm, while supporters emphasize potential improvements in mobility and regional resilience. As debates continue, the project faces a test: can a megaproject win broad consent or will it become a symbol of stalled promises and ongoing grievance in southern Italy?

Highlights

Whether this bold plan survives political and public scrutiny will shape Italy's approach to megaprojects for years to come