favicon

T4K3.news

New statin risk model keeps eligibility stable

Researchers find that a 3% risk threshold would keep statin eligibility roughly the same, even with a new risk model.

August 20, 2025 at 03:03 PM
blur What updated thresholds for statin use could mean for patients

Researchers compare PREVENT with older models to see how new risk thresholds affect who qualifies for statins.

New statin risk model keeps eligibility stable

A new risk calculator called PREVENT, introduced in November 2023, uses more contemporary and diverse data to estimate the 10‑year risk of a heart attack or stroke. When this model is applied to the old 7.5% threshold from the Pooled Cohort Equations, far fewer adults would qualify. But the new analysis shows that lowering the threshold to 3%, 4%, or 5% would yield different outcomes. Notably, using a 3% threshold would keep the number of people eligible for statins roughly the same as today. The PREVENT equations also account for conditions like chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and obesity to refine risk estimates.

Statins offer clear benefits in reducing cardiovascular events when paired with lifestyle changes, and they cost little. Yet side effects exist, including muscle pain and a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes over about ten years. Some experts argue the benefits may extend to thresholds as low as 2.5% or lower, while clinicians caution that broader use must balance diabetes risk with patient values and preferences. The American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology are expected to publish guidelines in the spring, with a focus on shared decision making between doctors and patients.

Key Takeaways

✔️
PREVENT uses contemporary, diverse data to estimate risk
✔️
Thresholds determine who is offered statins beyond a single number
✔️
A 3% threshold could keep eligibility close to current levels
✔️
Lower thresholds heighten concern about diabetes risk
✔️
Guidelines will emphasize shared decision making
✔️
Statins remain cost effective and widely accessible
✔️
PCE risk estimates have faced criticism for overestimation

"The bottom line is it’s just the math and making sure that we understand the risk and define who is eligible for statins based on who’s going to benefit"

Khan on eligibility criteria and risk assessment

"There are some circumstances for which the answer is obvious: The person who had a heart attack should be on a statin"

Sussman on treatment thresholds

"What we wanted to show is how the risk crosswalk looks like with PREVENT at 3%"

Khan on the 3% scenario

"The right number is a pretty large number"

Fonarow on the impact of threshold choice

The debate over thresholds shows medicine moving toward patient centered care. The PREVENT model reflects more recent data and a broader view of risk, but turning numbers into prescriptions remains a human task. The choice of threshold shapes who is offered treatment and who receives careful counseling about tradeoffs.

Policy makers face a tough balance: reduce preventable heart events without pushing statin use so far that diabetes risk and treatment burden rise. The coming guidelines will test how they reconcile numerical risk with individual health profiles and personal values, a challenge that goes beyond statistics to everyday clinical conversations.

Highlights

  • The right people on statins is the goal not more prescriptions
  • Contemporary data lower the risk estimate and open new doors for treatment
  • Guidelines will hinge on conversations not numbers alone
  • This is math with real human consequences

Public health impact of revised statin thresholds

Lowering the eligibility threshold could expand statin use and reduce some heart events, but it may raise diabetes risk and alter public reaction. Guidelines will influence practice patterns.

Guidelines will shape treatment decisions in the months ahead.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News