favicon

T4K3.news

Labour councillor faces violent disorder charge

Ricky Jones is on trial for allegedly inciting violence at a protest in east London after making throat-slitting remarks.

August 11, 2025 at 03:26 PM
blur Ricky Jones: Labour councillor told crowd far-right protesters 'need to have throats slit', court hears

A Labour councillor faces trial after allegedly telling anti far-right protesters to have their throats slit at a Walthamstow protest.

Labour councillor accused of inciting violence at east London protest

Ricky Jones, 58, a Labour councillor from Dartford, is on trial for encouraging violent disorder after a confrontation at an anti-racism protest in east London last August. A video shows him addressing a crowd, calling demonstrators disgusting Nazi fascists and making a throat slitting gesture. He denies the charge, saying the remarks were made in the heat of the moment and not meant to be taken literally. The Labour Party had warned him to stay away from the event and he was suspended the day after the speech.

The protest was organised in response to plans for a far right march outside the Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau and followed the Southport murders that unsettled the country. Prosecutors describe his speech as inflammatory and aimed at stirring up the crowd, while the defence argues the remarks were hyperbolic rhetoric not intended to incite violence. The case tests where public speech ends and violence begins, and whether a politician can argue heat of the moment as a legal excuse.

Key Takeaways

✔️
The case tests limits of political speech and incitement
✔️
Labour suspended the councillor after the incident
✔️
Rhetoric at protests can heighten violence risk
✔️
The court will weigh intent and surrounding circumstances
✔️
Public trust in elected officials could be affected
✔️
The outcome could influence party discipline in volatile situations
✔️
The case highlights tensions between anti racist protests and counter protests

"They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all."

Prosecutors describe Jones's remarks at the Walthamstow protest.

"I am sorry this was in the heat of the moment and not intended to be taken literally."

Jones's statement when speaking with police.

"This, in a setting where violence could readily have been anticipated."

Prosecutor's summary of risk during the speech.

"What did Mr Jones think was going to happen?"

Prosecutor's rhetorical question during opening remarks.

The case raises questions about the boundary between free speech and public safety in a political culture that watches rhetoric closely. A public official set a high bar for accountability when addressing a volatile crowd, and the outcome could affect how parties monitor members at protests. The trial also highlights how media coverage can amplify quotes and shape public perception of a party.

If a court finds incitement, Labour may face pressure to strengthen its guidelines on public appearances. The case also shows how local politics can swing on incidents that mix crime, immigration and counter protests. For voters, the verdict may influence trust in elected representatives and in the capacity of cities to manage dissent.

Highlights

  • They are disgusting Nazi fascists
  • We need to cut all their throats
  • What did Mr Jones think was going to happen
  • Sorry it was in the heat of the moment

political and public safety risk

The remarks involve violent rhetoric by a public official and could inflame tensions in local politics. The case tests the line between free speech and incitement and may influence party discipline in volatile situations.

The courtroom result may redefine what leaders can say in moments of protest.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News