favicon

T4K3.news

Labour councillor acquitted after protest remarks

Ricky Jones, a suspended Labour councillor, was found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder after a controversial protest in east London.

August 15, 2025 at 10:33 AM
blur Ricky Jones: Suspended Labour councillor who called for protesters' throats to be cut at rally not guilty of encouraging violent disorder

A suspended Labour councillor in Dartford was acquitted of encouraging violent disorder after a heated protest in east London.

Labour councillor cleared of encouraging violent disorder after protest speech

A suspended Labour councillor has been found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder after a protest in Walthamstow last August. Ricky Jones, 58, drew his finger across his throat and called demonstrators disgusting Nazi fascists during the anti-racism rally that followed the Southport murders. He had attended the event despite a party warning to stay away. Jurors at Snaresbrook Crown Court deliberated for about 30 minutes before acquitting him on one count. Jones later mouthed thanks to the jury as the verdict was read.

The protest occurred in a tense moment after leaders of a far-right march were planned near the nearby immigration bureau. Jones, who was also a full-time official for the Transport Salaried Staffs' Association, argued that he spoke in a setting where violence could be anticipated but that he believes in peaceful protest. Prosecutors described his remarks as inflammatory language meant to incite a crowd, while Jones defended his actions as a response to violence he condemns.

Key Takeaways

✔️
The jury cleared the councillor of the main charge
✔️
The case centers on whether heated speech constitutes violence incitement
✔️
Labour warned the councillor to stay away from the protest
✔️
The incident occurred in a high-tension political moment
✔️
Social media amplified footage of the rally
✔️
The verdict may influence future handling of protest rhetoric by officials

"I've always believed the best way to make people realise who you are and what you are is to do it peacefully"

Jones's stated belief on protest

"I did it in the heat of the moment"

Jones's defense regarding his remarks

The verdict places a spotlight on the line between heated rhetoric and incitement in politically charged moments. It shows how social media amplification can turn a moment of strong language into a public dispute over free speech, while juries weigh intent against potential harm. For Labour, the case tests party discipline and the way it handles members who, even briefly, cross boundaries during protests. The broader question is how communities balance protecting public safety with preserving the right to outspoken, even combative, political expression.

Highlights

  • I did it in the heat of the moment
  • I've always believed the best way to make people realise who you are and what you are is to do it peacefully
  • The best way to show who you are is to do it peacefully
  • Violence has no place in protest

Political and public reaction risk

The case touches on sensitive political speech and could provoke public backlash or scrutiny of party discipline and protest policing. The verdict may influence how similar rhetoric is treated in future demonstrations.

The court ruling leaves unresolved questions about where limits lie for speech in crowded demonstrations.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News