favicon

T4K3.news

Investment risk in cross border tech

Policy shifts in China or the US could affect cross border tech deals and returns.

August 8, 2025 at 07:51 AM
blur What to Know About Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan and His Business Dealings in China

An editorial look at Lip-Bu Tan and Walden International and three decades of China investments.

What to Know About Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan and His Business Dealings in China

Lip-Bu Tan built Walden International, a San Francisco based venture firm, and directed more than 5 billion dollars into over 600 companies. More than 100 of those investments targeted China, including a decade and a half on the board of Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp., now the country’s largest chipmaker.

The scale of these bets shows how long term capital shaped cross border tech ties, but the moves also invite questions about political risk and regulatory shifts in both countries.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Walden International directed more than 5 billion into hundreds of firms
✔️
China was the focus of more than 100 investments
✔️
Tan sat on the board of SMIC for about 15 years
✔️
Long term cross border bets shaped tech ties across decades
✔️
Regulatory and political shifts can affect investment value
✔️
The history mirrors a broader arc of venture capital in a global economy

"Lip-Bu Tan built Walden International into a global conduit for Chinese tech startups"

describes his role and impact

"Investing in China requires patience not quick wins"

editorial insight on risk and reward

"Cross border tech ties hinge on policy as much as profits"

note on policy significance

"Three decades of deals show how capital travels with risk and restraint"

summarizes the historical arc

Tan’s career shows how venture capital can span nations, linking startups with established players and supply chains. His China investments, including a long board tenure at SMIC, reflect how policy, local partnerships, and capital flows shaped the Chinese chip sector and its global links.

Yet this history raises questions about risk and accountability. Policy shifts in Beijing and Washington could alter returns and affect the people who rely on these deals. The piece invites readers to weigh the value of long term cross border collaboration against potential costs to public money, national security, and investor confidence.

Highlights

  • The China bet was a long game not a quick win
  • Patience is currency in cross border tech bets
  • Cross border tech ties hinge on policy as much as profits
  • Three decades of deals show capital travels with risk and restraint

political and regulatory risk in cross border investments

The article highlights potential political backlash, regulatory shifts in China and the US, and investor concerns about long term cross border bets.

The future will test whether long term bets can weather political winds.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News