T4K3.news
HS2 Ravenswood case develops
A private tenant used the HS2 bought Ravenswood home as a cannabis farm; investigation and legal actions continue.

An elderly man learns the house HS2 bought for public reasons later became a cannabis operation managed by a private tenant.
HS2 buys Ravenswood home ends up with cannabis farm
Alan Wilkinson, now 85, and his late wife Gillian lived at Ravenswood in the Staffordshire village of Whitmore Heath for about 40 years. In 2019, as HS2 planned a tunnel beneath the hillside, the couple began negotiations to sell the four-bedroom home. Gillian died two weeks before the sale closed, and HS2 bought Ravenswood for £1.2 million.
The house was then let through an external agency. In November 2022 police raided Ravenswood and found nearly 200 cannabis plants. The tenant, Darren Pinnington, pleaded guilty to producing cannabis and awaits sentencing. Because the cannabis operation damaged the home, HS2 says it cannot relist the property without costly repairs. The area is patrolled by private security teams who work closely with Staffordshire Constabulary.
Key Takeaways
"It's terrible."
Mr Wilkinson on the discovery and impact
"We utterly condemn the illegal use of property acquired by the project being used as a cannabis farm."
HS2 spokesperson responding to the incident
"HS2 destroyed our village."
Mr Wilkinson describing the impact on the community
"The area is patrolled by our private security teams who work closely with Staffordshire Constabulary."
HS2 on security measures after the incident
The Ravenswood case highlights the friction between public infrastructure projects and private lives. When taxpayers’ money funds a private home, questions rise about oversight, responsibility, and what happens to the property once a project changes course. It also shows how quick arrangements can become long-term costs if a rented setup spirals out of control.
Beyond the legal facts, the incident tests trust in large schemes and their ability to manage collateral effects on communities. It underscores the difficulty of balancing redevelopment ambitions with the realities faced by residents who watched years of work change a quiet village into a symbol of disruption and risk.
Highlights
- Public money should protect homes not haunt memories
- A village deserves a future not a scarred hillside
- Memory is priceless brick and mortar should not be collateral
- Big projects must account for the human cost
Budget and political risk in HS2 Ravenswood case
The case raises questions about how public funds are used to purchase private homes and how leased properties are managed, potentially affecting taxpayer costs and public trust in large infrastructure schemes.
The Ravenswood case puts a human face on the costs often hidden in large public projects.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Reeves moves to curb habitat protections to speed projects

Andy Burnham's office wins significant court case over £140m loan

HS2 homes in Whitmore Heath face new scrutiny

Maine reports first human case of Powassan virus this year

Carrone Detention Case Update

UN court allows legal actions for climate change damages

Tropical illnesses threaten travelers abroad

AI health guidance under scrutiny
