favicon

T4K3.news

Fringe attendance clashes with Oasis crowds in Edinburgh

A comedian blames Oasis for low Fringe turnout, prompting debate on crowd dynamics and scheduling.

August 9, 2025 at 11:50 AM
blur Furious comedian lashes out at Oasis after no one turns up to Fringe gig

A comedian blames Oasis for low attendance at Edinburgh Fringe shows, sparking a debate about crowd dynamics and scheduling.

Fringe attendance clashes with Oasis crowds in Edinburgh

A stand up comedian, Kate Smurthwaite, says Oasis crowds have distracted audiences from Edinburgh Fringe shows and led to two performances being canceled. The Oasis concerts at Murrayfield Stadium occurred on August 8, 9 and 12, drawing large crowds to the city while Fringe events ran concurrently. Smurthwaite posted a video claiming that groups wearing Oasis shirts were not interested in her show and that landlords are taking advantage of Oasis fans, forcing some performers to cancel. The Fringe is known as the world’s largest arts festival, with venues across the city relying on a steady stream of attendees. Reactions online were mixed, with some supporting the frustration and others arguing that the Fringe and Oasis attract different crowds and can coexist.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Smaller acts can feel squeezed when a headline act dominates the city’s schedule
✔️
Overlapping events can complicate housing and venue availability for fringe performers
✔️
Public backlash may follow when performers blame others for low attendance
✔️
Social media plays a key role in shaping the narrative around attendance issues
✔️
Festival organizers may need better cross-event planning and communication with landlords
✔️
Audience behavior during multi-event weeks can shift unexpectedly
✔️
The incident highlights the tension between big-name tours and grassroots performances
✔️
Edinburgh faces a broader challenge of balancing tourism with community arts interests

"Oasis should be more considerate of their fellow performers when they decide where and when to put their shows on"

Smurthwaite criticizes Oasis for scheduling choices

"Big groups of people in Oasis shirts are not interested in my show"

Smurthwaite describes audience behavior

"The Fringe Society should have seen this coming and done more about it"

Smurthwaite on festival planning

"There were plenty of people at Rizzle Kicks on the night of the first Oasis date"

Social media response from a commenter

This episode highlights how a single big-name act can influence a city’s festival ecosystem. It underscores the need for clearer coordination between event organizers, venues and landlords when calendars overlap. It also shows the risk of tying attendance trouble to a single headline act, rather than broader factors like weather, transport, and competing city-wide events. The debate raises questions about crowd management, venue allocation, and how cities plan for peak tourism periods while protecting smaller performers.

Highlights

  • The Oasis effect needs careful planning not blame
  • Two shows canceled shows a signal not a scapegoat
  • Crowd management is a shared duty for all events
  • Edinburgh must protect its diverse arts ecosystem

Public reaction risk to Fringe crowd dynamics

The claim that Oasis crowds caused low Fringe attendance raises potential backlash from performers, landlords, and fans. The situation could lead to tensions between festival organizers and major touring acts, with political and housing considerations.

As the Fringe season unfolds, planners must defend a diverse festival landscape while addressing real crowd pressures.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News