Final season of Squid Game critiques democracy

The final season of Squid Game critiques democracy through its brutal narrative.

Squid Game presents a grim view of democracy

In the series finale of Squid Game, voting plays a pivotal role in the fate of the remaining contestants. Initially, players have a chance to stop the deadly games through a vote, but as the seasons progress, their desire for wealth overrides their moral judgment. Creator Hwang Dong-hyuk highlighted a troubling trend in democracies around the world, as elections have become divisive rather than unifying. The show reflects current political realities, suggesting that greed and tribalism may corrupt even the most fundamental democratic processes.

The journey of Squid Game serves as a metaphor for contemporary societal issues. Hwang’s portrayal of voting as a dangerous illusion reveals a critique of how democracy can be manipulated for personal gain. The series suggests that the very systems designed for fairness can become tools of oppression, especially when unchecked by morality or empathy. This reflects deeper concerns about public trust in democratic institutions, raising questions about whether citizens truly have agency in their governance.

Highlights

As democracy faces challenges, Squid Game forces viewers to reevaluate their beliefs about choice and power.