favicon

T4K3.news

Dartmoor planning decision awaited

Dartmoor National Park Authority will decide on discharging conditions for Saunders and Edmondsons Dartmoor home extension

August 10, 2025 at 09:05 AM
blur Ab Fab and Bottom stars Jennifer Saunders and Adrian Edmondson face fresh planning battle over £250k extension to their £2m Dartmoor home

The Absolutely Fabulous and Bottom stars await a decision on discharging conditions for a £250k extension to their Grade II listed Dartmoor home.

Saunders and Edmondson face planning battle over Dartmoor home extension

Jennifer Saunders and Ade Edmondson are pursuing further works at their Grade II listed Dartmoor manor. They were granted permission last year for a new entrance, parking area, terrace, a workshop extension and other improvements, and now seek to discharge several conditions. The current application also aims to remove the requirement to submit details of a new painted timber door and to relax controls on where heat pumps will be installed. Dartmoor National Park Authority is still considering the application, with a decision pending.

Conservation officer Clare Vint raised concerns about the impact of the proposals on the building and its setting, noting the interior and exterior are of high significance both architecturally and historically. She warned that the proposed changes could harm the cottage and house relationship and that the project needs clearer justification and public benefit before any conditions are dropped. The plan cites lifestyle changes for the couple, who have split time between London and Devon, but planners must weigh private convenience against heritage safeguards.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Listed status heightens scrutiny of any extension or external works
✔️
The proposed expenditure is around £250 000, highlighting investment in rural living
✔️
Conservation officers warn of visual and contextual harm to the historic site
✔️
Applicants seek to discharge several planning conditions to ease changes
✔️
Decision on the discharge of conditions is not yet made by the authority
✔️
The case illustrates pressure to adapt heritage properties to modern needs
✔️
Public reaction and local scrutiny may influence the final ruling

"The impact on the significance of the listed buildings has not been minimised"

Conservation officer Clare Vint assessing the current application

"There is insufficient justification for the works and minimal public benefit"

Vint on the justification for the proposals

"The interior and exterior of the building are of high significance architecturally"

Vint describing the building and its setting

"They wish to make some sensitive alterations to better suit their current needs"

Applicants' statements supporting the extension

The case shows how private living spaces and celebrated homes can collide with public rules about heritage. On one side, the applicants seek flexibility to adapt a historic property to evolving needs. On the other, planners must protect the site’s character and its setting in a landscape that predates modern planning law. The result could set a precedent for how far listed buildings can be altered when owners argue for lifestyle changes. This is less about taste and more about balance between public interest and private desire.

Highlights

  • Heritage should guide every private update
  • Public benefit should back every listed building change
  • A small extension carries a big responsibility
  • Protecting character matters more than private convenience

Heritage planning risk

The project involves a listed building near Dartmoor in a planning process that weighs private upgrades against historic preservation. If conditions are loosened, it could set a precedent for future changes at sensitive sites.

The outcome will show how heritage protections adapt to changing lifestyles without erasing the past.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News