Controversy arises over placenta consumption decisions

The decision to consume placenta remains controversial and personal.

Judgments about placenta consumption are unfair

Calvin Harris and Vick Hope's revealing Instagram post showing intimate moments from their son's birth has sparked varied reactions online. The couple shared images that included their placenta, which led many followers to express shock. Following childbirth, some new mothers, including writer Ruby Deevoy, choose to consume their placenta for perceived health benefits, such as enhanced recovery and improved emotional wellness. While some find this idea horrifying, others see it as a personal choice with potential advantages. Though research on placenta consumption is limited, some advocates report positive effects. Deevoy shared her experience of drinking a smoothie containing her placenta, asserting that it made her feel energetic and improved her breast milk production. Despite possible health risks, such as bacterial infections, some mothers like Deevoy find the practice empowering and beneficial.

The societal reactions to placenta consumption highlight a significant tension between personal choice and public perception. Many view the practice as culturally taboo, leading to negative judgments. However, for some women, consuming their placenta offers more than health advantages; it represents a connection to their body and the birthing process. As discussions around women's health evolve, the need for open-mindedness is crucial. This issue directly ties into larger conversations about maternal autonomy and choices that resonate with their individual truths. For every parent who follows traditional routes of postpartum recovery, there exists another whose journey is shaped by unconventional decisions.

Highlights

Continued discourse on this topic can foster a more inclusive understanding of women's experiences.