favicon

T4K3.news

Rod Stewart AI tribute draws mixed family response

An AI generated Ozzy Osbourne image at a Rod Stewart concert sparked mixed reactions from families and raised questions about rights and consent.

August 8, 2025 at 05:39 PM
blur Relatives of deceased stars wade in on Rod Stewart’s controversial AI Ozzy Osbourne tribute

An AI generated image at a Rod Stewart concert depicting Ozzy Osbourne with late stars drew mixed reactions from families and raised legal questions.

Rod Stewart AI tribute to Ozzy Osbourne draws mixed family reactions

At a Rod Stewart show at the Ameris Bank Amphitheater in Alpharetta on August 1, an AI generated sequence showed Ozzy Osbourne posing with late icons such as Prince, Tina Turner, Tupac and Amy Winehouse. The clip sparked swift online backlash, with critics calling it tasteless or disrespectful. Some relatives and estates issued cautious or supportive statements; Mopreme Shakur told TMZ he has no problem memorialising the greats, while Cleopatra Bernard said she was glad XXXTentacion had made an impact.

Legal observers warned that using the likenesses of deceased celebrities can trigger rights issues and licensing questions across jurisdictions. Intellectual property expert Mark Engelman told The Times that passing off and image rights matters may arise if estates have not licensed the content. A blogger who shared the clip later expressed regret, calling AI driven content “an insidious beast.” Osbourne’s family has acknowledged his death with a tribute from his daughter, while Stewart’s representatives did not respond to requests for comment.

Key Takeaways

✔️
AI memorials test licensing and consent boundaries
✔️
Estates react differently to AI tributes
✔️
Legal rights around dead celebrities vary by jurisdiction
✔️
Public backlash and support can diverge within the same family
✔️
Tech and entertainment industries need clear guidelines
✔️
Memorialization through AI may reshape future tributes
✔️
Ethical considerations will shape investor and sponsor decisions

"I’m pretty sure we all love Rod Stewart"

Mopreme Shakur on support

"There are a number of legal issues which arise from the inclusion of images of dead personalities"

Mark Engelman on legal issues

"I am glad my son had made enough of an impact to be included"

Cleopatra Bernard on XXXTentacion

"I shouldn’t have posted this video"

Sloane Steel on her viral post

This episode highlights a growing tension between tribute culture and the rights and ethics of AI memory. It exposes how audiences—fans, families, and brands—grapple with consent, licensing, and the emotional weight of seeing deceased legends in new, digital formats. The uneven reactions from estates show there is no single rule yet, and that public mood can swing quickly when memory and technology collide.

The incident also raises practical questions for events and studios: who licenses AI generated likenesses, what safeguards protect a person’s memory, and how should public tribute balance art with respect? As AI tools become more capable, a clear framework for consent, attribution, and licensing will be essential to avoid a lasting chill on creative experimentation.

Highlights

  • AI is an insidious beast
  • I have no problem memorialising the greats
  • There are a number of legal issues which arise from the inclusion of images
  • I am glad my son had made enough of an impact to be included

AI memorialization raises legal and ethical questions

The use of AI generated images of deceased celebrities can trigger trademark, rights of publicity, and licensing concerns. Estate holders may pursue claims if licenses are not in place, and public backlash can affect brand and sponsor decisions.

The conversation about AI and memory is only getting started.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News