T4K3.news
Caremark faces 290 million penalty in Medicare fraud ruling
A federal judge orders Caremark to pay nearly 290 million in damages and penalties tied to Medicare Part D reporting in 2013 and 2014.

A federal judge orders CVS Health's Caremark to pay nearly 290 million in damages and penalties for false Medicare Part D cost reporting tied to 2013 and 2014.
Caremark Ordered to Pay 290 Million Penalty After Medicare Fraud Ruling
A federal judge in Philadelphia has ordered CVS Health's pharmacy benefit manager Caremark to pay about 289.9 million in damages and penalties plus 4.87 million in civil penalties after a finding of false cost reporting to Medicare Part D in 2013 and 2014. The verdict triples an earlier 95 million damages finding, with post judgment interest beginning immediately. The decision stems from a whistleblower filing by former Aetna actuary Sarah Behnke, who alleged Caremark manipulated drug cost reports to hide profits. CVS Health said it plans to appeal and noted the ruling covered only certain issues of liability while continuing to contest others. The court found Caremark acted with reckless disregard and deliberate ignorance, rather than actual knowledge, and emphasized that the overall fraud loss was substantial. The case involved multiple Caremark entities and centers on how drug costs were reported to Medicare Part D, ultimately overcharging the program by about 95 million.
Key Takeaways
"We plan to appeal"
CVS statement after the ruling
"We are pleased that the Behnke ruling in June was in our favor as to certain issues for CVS Pharmacy and CVS Health Corporation's liability"
CVS statement to press
"The fraud loss was certainly significant"
Judge Goldberg's memorandum describing damages
This ruling underscores how whistleblowers can drive accountability in complex health care programs. It shows courts are willing to use substantial penalties to deter misreporting in government drug programs, even when the company disputes some findings. The decision also highlights the tension between punitive penalties and due process, as regulators weigh how to calibrate fines to reflect the underlying harms without stifling legitimate business practices. For CVS Health, the case tests its governance posture and could influence future settlements or compliance overhauls. For patients and taxpayers, it signals that the system is watching and prepared to punish misleading reporting that drives up costs.
Highlights
- We plan to appeal
- We are pleased that the Behnke ruling in June was in our favor as to certain issues for CVS Pharmacy and CVS Health Corporation's liability
- The fraud loss was certainly significant
Financial and regulatory risk from court penalties
The ruling adds a large financial burden on CVS Health and may affect investor sentiment and regulatory scrutiny of Part D reporting practices. The case also raises questions about future penalties in similar fraud cases.
Expect further legal moves as the parties navigate post judgment processes
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Trump wins major fraud penalty ruling

Trump wins partial ruling on civil fraud case

Appeals court voids big civil penalty against Trump

New York Court Reverses Trump Civil Fraud Penalty

Arizona woman sentenced for North Korean fraud scheme

Wealth based fines hit Lausanne speedster

Michigan sanctioned by NCAA

Trump penalty overturned by New York appeals court
