favicon

T4K3.news

Caremark faces 290 million penalty in Medicare fraud ruling

A federal judge orders Caremark to pay nearly 290 million in damages and penalties tied to Medicare Part D reporting in 2013 and 2014.

August 20, 2025 at 08:23 PM
blur CVS Caremark ordered to pay $290 million penalty in Medicare fraud case

A federal judge orders CVS Health's Caremark to pay nearly 290 million in damages and penalties for false Medicare Part D cost reporting tied to 2013 and 2014.

Caremark Ordered to Pay 290 Million Penalty After Medicare Fraud Ruling

A federal judge in Philadelphia has ordered CVS Health's pharmacy benefit manager Caremark to pay about 289.9 million in damages and penalties plus 4.87 million in civil penalties after a finding of false cost reporting to Medicare Part D in 2013 and 2014. The verdict triples an earlier 95 million damages finding, with post judgment interest beginning immediately. The decision stems from a whistleblower filing by former Aetna actuary Sarah Behnke, who alleged Caremark manipulated drug cost reports to hide profits. CVS Health said it plans to appeal and noted the ruling covered only certain issues of liability while continuing to contest others. The court found Caremark acted with reckless disregard and deliberate ignorance, rather than actual knowledge, and emphasized that the overall fraud loss was substantial. The case involved multiple Caremark entities and centers on how drug costs were reported to Medicare Part D, ultimately overcharging the program by about 95 million.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Judgment triples earlier damages to about 289.9 million in damages and penalties
✔️
Civil penalties add another 4.87 million to the total
✔️
The fraud involved false Medicare Part D cost reports from 2013 and 2014
✔️
A whistleblower supplied the key evidence for the case
✔️
CVS Health plans an appeal and disputes some liability issues
✔️
Post judgment interest will accrue until full payment is made
✔️
Ruling signals tougher enforcement of Medicare program integrity
✔️
The decision hinges on recklessness rather than actual knowledge

"We plan to appeal"

CVS statement after the ruling

"We are pleased that the Behnke ruling in June was in our favor as to certain issues for CVS Pharmacy and CVS Health Corporation's liability"

CVS statement to press

"The fraud loss was certainly significant"

Judge Goldberg's memorandum describing damages

This ruling underscores how whistleblowers can drive accountability in complex health care programs. It shows courts are willing to use substantial penalties to deter misreporting in government drug programs, even when the company disputes some findings. The decision also highlights the tension between punitive penalties and due process, as regulators weigh how to calibrate fines to reflect the underlying harms without stifling legitimate business practices. For CVS Health, the case tests its governance posture and could influence future settlements or compliance overhauls. For patients and taxpayers, it signals that the system is watching and prepared to punish misleading reporting that drives up costs.

Highlights

  • We plan to appeal
  • We are pleased that the Behnke ruling in June was in our favor as to certain issues for CVS Pharmacy and CVS Health Corporation's liability
  • The fraud loss was certainly significant

Financial and regulatory risk from court penalties

The ruling adds a large financial burden on CVS Health and may affect investor sentiment and regulatory scrutiny of Part D reporting practices. The case also raises questions about future penalties in similar fraud cases.

Expect further legal moves as the parties navigate post judgment processes

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News