favicon

T4K3.news

Trump wins partial ruling on civil fraud case

New York appeals court voids nearly 515 million penalty but leaves the case open for appeals and further review.

August 21, 2025 at 06:17 PM
blur New York appeals court tosses $515m civil fraud penalty against Trump

An appeals court in New York voided a nearly 515 million civil penalty against the president, signaling ongoing legal battles.

New York appeals court tosses 515 million civil fraud penalty against Trump

An appeals court in New York on Thursday tossed out the nearly 515 million civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, calling the amount excessive under the Eighth Amendment. The five-judge panel did not overturn the lower court’s finding that Trump and his co defendants had misrepresented wealth, but it dismissed the disgorgement remedy and left room for further review of the lower court’s ruling. The lower court had originally ordered about 355 million in penalties, a figure that grew with interest to roughly 515 million.

Trump applauded the decision on Truth Social, calling it a total victory while arguing the case was politically motivated. New York Attorney General Letitia James’s office said it intends to appeal, arguing the fraud findings still merit scrutiny and that the state will continue to pursue accountability.

Key Takeaways

✔️
The penalty was dismissed as excessive under the Eighth Amendment
✔️
Fraud findings from the lower court remain unsettled on appeal
✔️
The ruling preserves the possibility of further appeals
✔️
Trump frames the outcome as a political win while denouncing the case
✔️
James plans to appeal to continue pursuing the case
✔️
The decision adds to a crowded landscape of high-profile legal battles around Trump
✔️
The legal process in this matter is likely to extend into new court rulings and timelines

"The frauds found here leap off the page and shock the conscience"

Engoron's characterization in the lower court ruling

"TOTAL VICTORY in the FAKE New York State Attorney General Letitia James Case! I greatly respect the fact that the Court had the Courage to throw out this unlawful and disgraceful Decision that was hurting Business all throughout New York State"

Trump on Truth Social after the ruling

"They are accused only of inflating asset values to make more money. The documents prove this over and over again"

Engoron's description of the fraud findings

"A Political Witch Hunt, in a business sense, the likes of which no one has ever seen before"

Trump's description of the case

The ruling highlights a clash between punitive remedies and constitutional limits. By voiding the financial penalty but not fully overturning the fraud findings, the court preserves a prosecutorial stance while avoiding a crippling monetary sanction. The split opinions among the panel members also reveal a broader debate about how far civil penalties should go in cases involving high-profile figures.

The decision keeps the case alive in the courts and preserves a public theater around Trump’s business practices. It may influence how future civil penalties are crafted in white-collar cases, especially when public interest and political pressure intersect with legal standards.

Highlights

  • The penalty was too high to stand
  • Appeals keep the case alive long after the ruling
  • Politics and law collide in high profile cases
  • Justice without fear of fame is the aim

Political and public reaction risk tied to high profile case

The decision involves a sitting president, a high-stakes civil penalty, and ongoing political debate. It could trigger further legal challenges and public backlash as different sides use the ruling to support their narratives.

The legal story is far from finished and will continue to unfold in multiple courts.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News