T4K3.news
Trump wins partial ruling on civil fraud case
New York appeals court voids nearly 515 million penalty but leaves the case open for appeals and further review.

An appeals court in New York voided a nearly 515 million civil penalty against the president, signaling ongoing legal battles.
New York appeals court tosses 515 million civil fraud penalty against Trump
An appeals court in New York on Thursday tossed out the nearly 515 million civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, calling the amount excessive under the Eighth Amendment. The five-judge panel did not overturn the lower court’s finding that Trump and his co defendants had misrepresented wealth, but it dismissed the disgorgement remedy and left room for further review of the lower court’s ruling. The lower court had originally ordered about 355 million in penalties, a figure that grew with interest to roughly 515 million.
Trump applauded the decision on Truth Social, calling it a total victory while arguing the case was politically motivated. New York Attorney General Letitia James’s office said it intends to appeal, arguing the fraud findings still merit scrutiny and that the state will continue to pursue accountability.
Key Takeaways
"The frauds found here leap off the page and shock the conscience"
Engoron's characterization in the lower court ruling
"TOTAL VICTORY in the FAKE New York State Attorney General Letitia James Case! I greatly respect the fact that the Court had the Courage to throw out this unlawful and disgraceful Decision that was hurting Business all throughout New York State"
Trump on Truth Social after the ruling
"They are accused only of inflating asset values to make more money. The documents prove this over and over again"
Engoron's description of the fraud findings
"A Political Witch Hunt, in a business sense, the likes of which no one has ever seen before"
Trump's description of the case
The ruling highlights a clash between punitive remedies and constitutional limits. By voiding the financial penalty but not fully overturning the fraud findings, the court preserves a prosecutorial stance while avoiding a crippling monetary sanction. The split opinions among the panel members also reveal a broader debate about how far civil penalties should go in cases involving high-profile figures.
The decision keeps the case alive in the courts and preserves a public theater around Trump’s business practices. It may influence how future civil penalties are crafted in white-collar cases, especially when public interest and political pressure intersect with legal standards.
Highlights
- The penalty was too high to stand
- Appeals keep the case alive long after the ruling
- Politics and law collide in high profile cases
- Justice without fear of fame is the aim
Political and public reaction risk tied to high profile case
The decision involves a sitting president, a high-stakes civil penalty, and ongoing political debate. It could trigger further legal challenges and public backlash as different sides use the ruling to support their narratives.
The legal story is far from finished and will continue to unfold in multiple courts.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Trump wins partial relief in NY fraud case

Trump wins major fraud penalty ruling

New York Court Reverses Trump Civil Fraud Penalty

Appeals court voids Trump penalty

DOJ subpoenas NY AG in Trump civil rights probe

DOJ probes Letitia James in Trump civil case

DOJ probes New York AG office tied to Trump case

Appeals court voids big civil penalty against Trump
