T4K3.news
BBC retracts false statistic in Letby Panorama
The BBC removed the 40x figure and clarified that Letby was in training during both periods.

A Panorama episode on Lucy Letby faced criticism for a disputed statistic and is now corrected after experts questioned its accuracy.
BBC retracts false statistic in Letby Panorama
The BBC has corrected a line in Panorama that claimed breathing tubes were dislodged 40 times more often during Lucy Letby shifts at Liverpool Women’s Hospital. The correction follows sharp criticism from statisticians and Letby’s lawyers who called the claim misleading and wrong. The programme has been updated on iPlayer and the language clarified to separate Letby’s training period from the shift data used in the analysis.
The broadcaster said the film did not intend to conflate shifts with ventilated shifts and noted that the underlying Liverpool Women’s Hospital review was the source for the figures, not a direct measurement by the Panorama team. Critics pushed for greater care with statistics in a high profile criminal case and for transparency about data sources.
Key Takeaways
"We have removed that line from the programme and edited the version on iPlayer"
BBC statement about the correction
"The documentary was sloppy, amateurish and full of errors"
Letbys legal representative comments on the programme
"Very concerning"
Dr Amy Wilson comment on the segment
"This is a fine example of statistical illiteracy which can mislead juries and the general public"
Jane Hutton critique of the statistics
The episode exposes a broader risk in investigative media when numbers are used to frame guilt or innocence. Journalists must balance probing questions with precise methodology, especially in cases that grip public attention and involve families who live with the aftermath. The correction shows how quickly errors can ripple across public perception, potentially shaping juries, public opinion, and the credibility of the media itself.
Beyond this specific episode, the incident underscores the need for clear data literacy in newsroom practices. As audiences demand faster turnarounds, robust checks and external validation become more important to preserve trust in reporting on sensitive, high stakes topics.
Highlights
- Statistical illiteracy can mislead juries and the public
- Sloppy journalism costs trust in a delicate case
- Corrections are a first step toward restoring credibility
- Accuracy matters in high stakes cases
Editorial risk over sensitive statistics in high profile crime coverage
The episode shows how a disputed statistic in a high profile criminal case can damage public understanding and trust. There is potential for backlash from families, critics, and audience segments who feel misled, making transparent data handling and rapid correction essential.
The newsroom faces a test of credibility that will outpace any single correction.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Farage claims crime data is flawed

David Attenborough’s Parenthood premieres tonight

Stepmother regrets taking child to riot after Southport attack

Melania Trump threatens defamation suit

Stepmother regrets taking son to Southport riot

Melania Trump defamation case

BBC Verify clarifies footage of Thailand-Cambodia clashes

Macrons sue Candace Owens over defamation claims
