T4K3.news
Anna Delvey rabbit photo stunt draws backlash
A controversial photoshoot in New York involved borrowed rabbits later abandoned in a park, drawing animal welfare criticism and questions about responsibility.

Convicted con artist Anna Delvey faces new scrutiny after a controversial photoshoot involving rabbits and subsequent abandonment.
Anna Delvey Bunny Photoshoot Triggers Backlash in New York
In New York City, Anna Delvey, whose real name is Anna Sorokin, posed in a strapless sundress, white pumps, and an ankle monitor while holding two rabbits on a hot pink leash. After the shoot, the rabbits were abandoned in Prospect Park. The animals had been rescued earlier that week by vegan influencer Terry Chao, who identified them as Moon and Parker.
Delvey credited Christian Batty as the rabbit scout in the photo caption. Batty later apologized, saying he had no knowledge of the plan to release the rabbits and that he panicked when he realized they would be surrendered to him. Chao and Batty explained that they helped rescue a third rabbit named Joaquin and that all three rabbits are now in foster care while donors raise funds.
Delvey said she did not participate in the acquisition, transport, or return of the animals and would not condone such actions. Online critics and animal rights defenders criticized the stunt, and Batty's apology and Delvey's statements did not fully quell the backlash.
Key Takeaways
"When I realized the rabbits were being surrendered to me, I panicked. At 19, with no experience caring for animals, no pet-friendly housing, and no knowledge of available resources, I felt overwhelmed and made the worst possible choice."
Batty explains his actions in the incident
"I do not eat meat, and I had no involvement in the acquisition, transport, or return of these animals. I would never condone these actions."
Delvey denies involvement
"It's never okay to dump your pet, ever."
Jenna Goins comments on the incident
"Bunnies should not be kept on leashes like that."
Chao comments on animal treatment
The episode sits at the crossroads of celebrity culture and animal welfare. It shows how social media stunts can have real life consequences for animals and people involved. It also raises questions about accountability when many parties share responsibility for a stunt.
This case highlights the volatility of online reaction and the challenge for influencers to manage a crisis when the facts are murky. It could push more attention to how borrowed pets are sourced and treated in media projects.
Highlights
- Pets are not props for glamour shoots.
- Borrowed rabbits deserve a real home not a stunt.
- Care and consent must come before a click.
- This is a test of accountability not a trend.
Animal welfare concerns tied to borrowed rabbits
The incident raises questions about the treatment of animals in media projects and the potential for public backlash and legal exposure for involved parties.
The rescued rabbits now await homes as the debate over pet treatment in public stunts continues
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Attention needed

Rabbits dumped after photoshoot linked to Sorokin

OnlyFans Stars Engage in Extreme Sex Challenges

Trump's trip to Scotland overshadowed by Epstein links

Kim Kardashian sparks mixed reaction with Skims face wrap

Sydney Sweeney's political affiliation uncovered amid ad controversy

Colorado rabbits grow hornlike growths from a common virus

AI edited photos in property listing draw scrutiny
