favicon

T4K3.news

Attention needed

A rabbit photo shoot becomes a welfare and accountability story as rabbits are found in Prospect Park and a team member takes responsibility for releasing them

August 11, 2025 at 06:39 PM
blur Anna Delvey Swears She Didn’t Dump Those Rabbits

A rabbit photo shoot turns into a welfare and accountability dispute after rabbits were found roaming near Prospect Park.

Anna Delvey Denies Dumping Rabbits After Assistant Confession

Anna Delvey posted images of rabbits during a recent photo shoot in New York. The caption described the scene as a bunny party. Only two rabbits appear in the posted images, and the total number used remains unclear.

Days later, a vegan blogger reported rabbits seen in Prospect Park with the same black carrier used in the shoot. A local rabbit rescue volunteer named Terry Chao took steps to help and said the animals were safe. An assistant on the shoot later apologized in posts on NYC Bunnies and his own account, admitting he released the rabbits after the shoot. Delvey has denied responsibility for acquiring or returning the animals. In an email to the Cut she said the assistant claimed to borrow rabbits but had obtained them through Facebook Marketplace with a plan to release them in the park, a plan she says she did not know about. As of now the rabbits are with Chao and are being placed in homes or foster care with donations being raised to support their care.

Key Takeaways

✔️
The incident highlights how social media stunts can backfire on celebrities
✔️
Animal welfare questions demand transparent sourcing and care standards
✔️
An internal misstep by a junior assistant triggered a public crisis
✔️
Online communities independently surface concerns that influence coverage
✔️
Delvey's statements shift blame between herself and her team
✔️
The case illustrates growing scrutiny of influencer practices in fashion and media
✔️
Public scrutiny can compel faster responses from high profile figures

"I lied to you, Anna, and the rest of the team about the rabbits"

Assistant apology posted to NYC Bunnies and the assistant's own account

"The idea that someone would compromise the well being of innocent animals for personal networking opportunities is deeply disturbing to me"

Delvey replying to coverage via email to the Cut

"I do not eat meat, and I had no involvement in the acquisition, transport, or return of these animals"

Delvey statement denying involvement

"As talent, it’s not my job to source or return animals, but I will never work with them again without knowing exactly where they came from"

Delvey further comment on sourcing and responsibility

The episode tests the line between celebrity PR and animal welfare. It shows how social media can magnify a misstep and blur the chain of responsibility from a production team to the person in front of the camera. Transparency about sourcing and care is not a luxury; it is a baseline expectation for any shoot involving animals.

The longer trend here is a shift in accountability from celebrities to their crews, sponsors, and platforms. Audiences are quick to judge and quicker to share, turning a single incident into a public case study on ethics in influencer culture. This could push brands and commentators to demand clearer sourcing and stricter vetting before a post goes live.

Highlights

  • Borrowed for a shoot not a license to neglect
  • Animals deserve proper sourcing and care not a viral moment
  • Accountability travels online as fast as a hashtag
  • Talent or team ethics must lead the plan not a post

Animal welfare and influencer accountability risk

The piece raises questions about how animals are sourced and handled for shoots and the potential for public backlash. It also highlights the risk that a junior assistant bears the moral and possible legal weight of a misstep, which could affect brands and future collaborations.

The rabbit episode tests what responsibility looks like when attention is a currency.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News