Analysis of Berry 100 Facts

An editorial look at Berry’s 100 facts before the 2025 fantasy draft and what it reveals about stats, bias, and reader judgment.

Matthew Berry 100 Facts to Know Before Draft 2025

Matthew Berry has published a long list of 100 so-called facts meant to guide fantasy players ahead of the 2025 draft. The pieces cover stars across positions and weave in talks of targets, carries, and fantasy points while also exposing Berry’s wider point about how data can be used to tell almost any story. The piece stresses that nothing in the numbers is black and white and urges readers to consult multiple sources and apply context rather than taking a single chart as gospel.

The article doubles as a meta critique of fantasy media and its marketing. Berry openly discusses his own tools, sponsorships, and the push to sell products, reminding readers that the real work is in watching games and thinking for oneself. By listing facts alongside admissions about cherry-picking, he asks fans to separate clever numbers from credible guidance and to stay wary of narratives shaped by the latest ADP chatter and headlines.

This column operates on two levels at once. It is a defense of data literacy in a field crowded with opinion and hype, and a cautionary note about how easily numbers can be steered to support a preferred view. The author uses concrete player references to illustrate a broader point: numbers wield power only when readers understand their limits and the context in which they were gathered. The piece also critiques the economics of fantasy sports content, highlighting how marketing and premium tools can color analysis even as they claim objectivity.

Taken together, the piece invites readers to adopt a healthy skepticism. It valorizes curiosity over certainty and suggests that a thoughtful fan will cross-check stats, weigh scouting insight, and resist the lure of a single dominant voice. The risk is not that data is useless, but that it becomes a weapon for whoever wields it best.

Highlights

Numbers are tools, not verdicts, and readers should keep their own judgment sharp.