favicon

T4K3.news

UFC Paramount deal shifts pay per view

The UFC signs a seven year deal with Paramount moving most pay per views to streaming and CBS, altering how fighters earn

August 12, 2025 at 03:17 PM
blur UFC: Georges St-Pierre and Jake Paul question if UFC's new broadcast deal will benefit fighters

Georges St-Pierre and Jake Paul question how the new seven year Paramount broadcast deal will affect fighters' pay.

UFC Paramount deal tests fighter leverage

The UFC announced a seven year broadcast deal with Paramount that shifts most pay per views to Paramount's streaming service and to CBS networks. The deal is reportedly worth more than £700m per year, a sharp rise from the ESPN pact that previously governed UFC broadcasts. The arrangement could broaden the league's audience and boost overall revenue, but it also raises questions about how fighters will be compensated, especially those who previously earned a share of pay per view sales. Retired star Georges St-Pierre warned the deal could be good for the promotion but terrible for fighters who negotiate contracts today, arguing they may lose leverage if promotion duties are shared by the UFC. Jake Paul welcomed the transparency around UFC revenue, saying athletes can finally see the numbers behind the sport's economics and urging fighters to know their worth. Historically, top names did receive PPV points on top of purses, a practice now under scrutiny as the landscape shifts toward streaming models.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Paramount deal expands UFC reach and monetization
✔️
Fighter leverage may shift away from pay per view points
✔️
Promoter gains profit certainty while fighters face revenue uncertainty
✔️
Public and investor interest will depend on visible fighter compensation
✔️
Stars previously earning PPV points could see reduced incentives
✔️
Transparency around UFC revenue invites new negotiation dynamics
✔️
Streaming first approach may alter event promotion strategies
✔️
Long term impact on fighter pay remains unresolved

"It could be good for the UFC, as a promoter, but terrible for the fighters because when I was competing I was able to have a great argument to negotiate on my contract."

St-Pierre on fighter leverage under the new deal

"No more PPV excuses Get your worth boys and girls"

Paul on fighters valuing themselves

"The deal is reportedly worth more than £700m a year"

Deal scale

"PPV points shaped the earnings of stars like Ronda Rousey St-Pierre and Jones"

Historical pay structure

The shift to Paramount signals a broader move in sports media toward streaming, which can grow reach but may also compress the negotiating power of individual athletes. If most revenue runs through a centralized platform, fighters risk losing bargaining chips tied to event size and buyer interest. The voices of St-Pierre and Paul frame a larger debate about whether the UFC should offer explicit revenue sharing, equity stakes, or other incentives to keep stars engaged. Public reaction could hinge on whether fans see value in the new distribution or feel athletes are once again asked to carry the cost of a richer media deal.

Highlights

  • No more PPV excuses Get your worth
  • It could be good for the UFC as a promoter but terrible for the fighters
  • The deal is worth more than £700m a year
  • PPV points shaped earnings for stars like Ronda Rousey St-Pierre and Jones

Financial impact and potential backlash

The new seven year Paramount deal could reshape fighter compensation and raise concerns about revenue sharing, budget priorities, and public reaction from fans and investors. The sustainability of higher payouts for stars depends on streaming profits and subscriber growth.

The next years will reveal whether the money leads to fairer pay or greater inequality.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News