favicon

T4K3.news

Trump reverses Biden order on competition

Trump revoked Biden's 2021 executive order promoting competition, signaling a shift in antitrust policy.

August 13, 2025 at 11:47 PM
blur Trump revokes Biden order promoting competition in the US economy

Trump revokes Biden's 2021 executive order to promote competition, signaling a major shift in antitrust enforcement.

Trump Reverses Biden Competition Order and Reshapes Antitrust Policy

Trump on Wednesday revoked the 2021 executive order issued by Biden to promote competition in the US economy. The White House confirmed the move, marking a reversal of a signature effort aimed at curbing anti-competitive practices in sectors from agriculture to healthcare and labor. The Justice Department welcomed the change, describing its preferred path as an America first antitrust approach that favors free markets over what it calls the Biden administration's overly prescriptive methods. It also cited progress in streamlining merger reviews under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and the use of targeted consent decrees.

Biden’s order, issued in July 2021, sought to strengthen enforcement against excessive market concentration and market power. Critics argued it could help consumers by reducing fees and costs associated with large mergers, while supporters said the policy would restore balance in industries with dominant players. The revocation raises questions about whether competition policy will remain a bipartisan concern or become a volatile political issue as lawmakers and agencies weigh how best to balance growth, innovation, and consumer protection.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Trump reverses Biden antitrust push by scrapping the 2021 order
✔️
DOJ frames a shift toward a freer market orientation
✔️
HSR process could be streamlined for faster merger reviews
✔️
Public costs and consumer impact remain a point of contention
✔️
Policy swings risk blurring lines between politics and economics
✔️
The move tests bipartisan credibility on competition policy
✔️
Analysts expect a push toward targeted enforcement rather than broad mandates

"America first antitrust approach focused on free markets instead of the Biden administration's prescriptive approach"

DOJ description of the revocation

"overly prescriptive and burdensome approach"

DOJ critique of Biden's order

"enforce the antitrust laws to combat the excessive concentration of industry"

Biden's original aim

"Those moves have cost Americans at least $18bn in higher fees"

analysis cited by consumer groups

Policy swings like this show how antitrust enforcement can drift with political winds. The reversal highlights a longer-term tension: should the state steadily police market power or lean toward deregulation to please credit markets and investors? Either path can change the price of everyday goods and the cost of everyday services. The move also tests the idea that targeted tools such as streamlined merger reviews and strategic consent decrees can deliver consumer wins without broad regulatory overhauls.

Going forward, a pragmatic middle ground may serve the public better than periodic policy storms. A steady, evidence-based approach that preserves core antitrust safeguards while applying flexible rules could reduce uncertainty for businesses and households. In that light the Hart-Scott-Rodino updates and more precise consent decrees might offer a durable framework that protects competition without stalling investment.

Highlights

  • Markets work best when rules stay steady
  • Policy swings cost households more than they save
  • Antitrust policy should protect consumers not corporate power
  • A predictable framework beats constant overturns

Political and budget risk in antitrust policy reversal

The reversal injects political volatility into competition policy, with potential backlash from consumer groups and investors worried about regulatory clarity and budgeting for agencies.

A steady policy on competition matters more than the headlines around it.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News