favicon

T4K3.news

Trump order to target cartels faces Mexican pushback

Mexico rejects invasion as reports surface of a US directive to use military force against drug cartels.

August 8, 2025 at 05:49 PM
blur Sheinbaum rejects US ‘invasion’ after Trump orders military to target Mexico cartels

Mexico rejects invasion while reports surface of a US directive to use military force against drug cartels.

Trump order to target cartels faces Mexican pushback

Reports say a secret Trump executive order would authorize direct U.S. military actions against drug cartels labeled as terrorist organizations in Latin America. Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum rejected invasion, saying US troops would not enter Mexican soil and that the idea is off the table. Mexican officials also said they would not allow any US military presence on their territory.

Supporters say the move could give U.S. agencies new tools to disrupt cartel networks and protect communities. Critics warn it could backfire, damage bilateral cooperation, and complicate trade and security work along the border. The episode sits against a background of past steps such as designating cartels as foreign terrorist organizations and ongoing border concerns. Analysts note that while the United States already uses a mix of sanctions and law enforcement powers, a direct military option would mark a significant shift in policy and practice.

Key Takeaways

✔️
US expands tools against cartels with military options
✔️
Mexico asserts sovereignty and rejects invasion
✔️
Domestic legal challenges loom over US authority
✔️
Bilateral security cooperation could face pressure or strain
✔️
Regional security dynamics may shift away from collaboration
✔️
Designations of cartels as terrorists widen enforcement reach
✔️
Public reaction and investor nerves hinge on details
✔️
Long-term cooperation with Mexico under scrutiny

"There will be no invasion. It’s off the table, absolutely off the table."

Sheinbaum denies any US invasion

"It allows us to now target what they’re operating and to use other elements of American power, intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense, whatever … to target these groups if we have an opportunity to do it."

Rubio explains the scope of authority

"This to me is the next logical step."

Jack Riley on expanding tools against cartels

"It would have very serious consequences where Mexico would stop cooperating."

Farfan-Mendez warns of potential backlash on cooperation

The proposal signals a shift from a law enforcement mindset to a tougher security posture. It raises questions about sovereignty, legality, and how far Washington should go without consent from Mexico. Legal hurdles at home could slow any move, even if leaders push ahead.

The move also changes regional security dynamics. If Mexico questions or resists cooperation, long-standing programs like the Mérida Initiative could be strained. The broader concern is whether unilateral power grabs will erode trust and undermine the shared goal of reducing drug flow, human trafficking, and violence in the region.

Highlights

  • There will be no invasion it’s off the table
  • It allows us to now target what they’re operating and to use other elements of American power
  • This to me is the next logical step
  • It would have very serious consequences where Mexico would stop cooperating

Diplomatic risk and legal questions

The move could strain US-Mexico relations, invite domestic legal challenges in the US, and affect ongoing cooperation on security and trade.

Diplomacy will be the real test as details emerge

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News