favicon

T4K3.news

Three women charged under Terrorism Act after Edinburgh incident

The suspects are due to appear in court following a van crash into a defence facility.

July 20, 2025 at 02:37 PM
blur Three women charged under Terrorism Act after van driven into fence of defence factory

Three women are charged after ramming a van into a defence factory in Edinburgh.

Three women face charges under Terrorism Act in Edinburgh

Police in Edinburgh have charged three women under the Terrorism Act following an incident where a van crashed into an external fence of the Leonardo defence facility last Tuesday. The suspects, aged 31, 34, and 42, are set to appear in court on Monday. The investigation is being led by Police Scotland's Counter Terrorism Unit, which is also seeking information regarding the movements of a blue Ford Transit and a white Honda CR-Z around the time of the incident. The direct action group Shut Down Leonardo is reportedly behind the protest, claiming the factory produces parts for Israel's F-35 fighter jets. Leonardo has denied supplying equipment directly to Israel, emphasizing that peaceful protest is a right but not at the expense of safety and respect for workers.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Three women charged under the Terrorism Act in Edinburgh.
✔️
Incident occurred at a Leonardo defence facility.
✔️
The suspects are scheduled to appear in court on Monday.
✔️
Investigation focuses on movements of two specific vehicles.
✔️
Direct action group Shut Down Leonardo claims responsibility.
✔️
Leonardo denies supplying equipment directly to Israel.

"The right to peaceful protest is an important principle in our society, however, aggressive and violent activity should have no place in protest."

This statement from a Leonardo spokesperson outlines the company's stance on protest actions aiming at their facilities.

"Leonardo UK is subject to UK government export controls and does not supply equipment direct to Israel."

This response clarifies Leonardo's role amidst accusations from activist groups.

This incident shines a light on the tensions surrounding defense contractors and the ongoing debates about military involvement in international conflicts. While many support the right to protest, the methods employed by activist groups raise significant questions about boundaries. The repercussions of such actions not only affect the individuals involved but also echo in public sentiment towards the defense industry, especially regarding ethical considerations in arms production.

Highlights

  • Peaceful protest is a right but violence is not acceptable.
  • The public deserves to understand the stakes behind these actions.
  • This incident underscores the conflict between activism and safety.
  • The tension around defense contractors continues to grow.

Risk of backlash from public and stakeholders

The incident could provoke reactions from both activist groups and defense stakeholders, sparking discussions about safety and freedom of protest.

The outcome of this case may have broader implications for protests in the UK.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News