favicon

T4K3.news

Sullivan weighing Potter sacking

West Ham owner David Sullivan is considering whether to sack Graham Potter after back to back defeats.

August 23, 2025 at 06:20 AM
blur What West Ham owner David Sullivan is now contemplating after Graham Potter loses another game

West Ham owner David Sullivan is weighing a managerial change after back-to-back losses.

Sullivan weighs sacking Potter after two heavy defeats

West Ham lost 3-0 at Sunderland on the opening day, then 5-1 to Chelsea at the London Stadium, leaving Graham Potter under renewed pressure. Potter arrived in January, replacing Julen Lopetegui, but the team has struggled to win under his watch. After 21 games in charge he has the worst win percentage in the club's history, a record that has intensified scrutiny from fans and staff. Sullivan was at the stadium on Friday night as the latest defeat deepened the sense of urgency around the club.

TBR Football has reported that the West Ham hierarchy had concerns about Potter before this run, and those concerns are now playing out in public. Bailey said the manager began the season on the back foot and that the owner is feeling pressure, weighing whether a change is necessary. Potter stressed in his post-match remarks that he accepts responsibility, that the players care, and that everyone must do more in a tough spell.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Sullivan faces renewed pressure after consecutive defeats
✔️
Potter holds the club's worst win rate in history
✔️
A potential change would signal a shift in West Ham's strategy
✔️
Public scrutiny is likely to intensify regardless of the outcome
✔️
The decision could affect recruitment and player morale
✔️
Fans are watching management decisions closely for signs of direction
✔️
Stability vs urgency will define the club's next moves

"The problem for Graham Potter is that he started this season on the back foot."

Bailey's assessment of Potter's start

"You are under pressure all the time in these jobs in this situation, that is how it is."

Potter reflecting on the pressure after the loss

"Ideally, he doesn’t want to, but if this squad are not committed to Potter, that is a huge problem."

Sullivan's reported stance on the situation

West Ham finds itself at a crossroads where ownership decisions overshadow any on-pitch talk. Sullivan's willingness to consider a change signals that results trump tenure, even with a midseason appointment under review. Any move would reshuffle plans for recruitment and could unsettle a squad built to challenge higher up the table.

The case also exposes the risks for owners who must balance ambition with stability. A change could inject urgency but invite disruption, while sticking with Potter risks continued stagnation and mounting fan fatigue. In the coming days, the club will weigh short term gains against long term strategy and what kind of identity it wants to project.

Highlights

  • The clock is ticking at the London Stadium
  • Two defeats in two games will not quiet the voices around the club
  • Owners cannot hide behind patience when the scoreboard tells a different story
  • Potter faces a test of loyalty from players and fans alike

Management change risk at West Ham

The article centers on a potential managerial change, a sensitive topic with implications for club strategy, staff morale, and fan reaction. The decision could create disruption or backlash if action is taken mid season.

The path ahead will test West Ham's balance of ambition and stability.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News