T4K3.news
Royal gossip claim drives palace talk
A new biography raises a long disputed claim about Prince Philip and Susie Barrantes, prompting renewed scrutiny of royal rumors.

A new biography argues a long standing link between Prince Philip and Susie Barrantes, stirring fresh discussion about royal rumors.
Royal gossip claim drives palace talk about Philip and Susie Barrantes
Andrew Lownie’s biography presents a claim that Prince Philip had a long affair with Susie Barrantes, the mother of Sarah Ferguson. The book opens with a scene of the Duke and Duchess of York on their wedding day described as lovers in the same carriage, a detail Lownie treats as fact based on a trusted family source. He says the claim comes from within the family and has not been withdrawn in interviews, even when challenged.
The report sits in a broader tradition of royal gossip that has followed the monarchy for decades. The piece notes that official denials have appeared in the past to quash public questions about a rift between the Queen and the Duke. It also points to the role of social circles, memoirs, and media dramatizations in shaping what people remember about royal life, including echoes in popular culture such as The Crown and other retrospective accounts.
Key Takeaways
"That there was something going on between Prince Philip and Ferguson’s wife."
David Rogers described gossip within the Thursday Club.
"I have known the story for over 30 years"
Lownie explains his long familiarity with the tale.
"It is quite untrue that there is any rift between the Queen and the Duke"
Palace denial mentioned in the article
"Gossip travels fast in royal circles and lingers"
Author commentary on royal rumor culture
This story tests how a biography handles unverified claims about a figure as scrutinized as Prince Philip. Biographers rely on sources that can vary in credibility, and the line between rumor and record is often contested when dealing with public figures. The piece highlights the need for careful sourcing and transparent attribution, especially when the subjects matter to large audiences who bring their own memories and biases to the discussion.
Beyond facts, the episode invites a wider debate about how royal life is narrated. Public fascination with private lives can outpace verifiable evidence, turning whispers into history. The challenge for readers is to distinguish documented history from reminiscence, gossip, or sensational framing, while acknowledging that biographers may recover aspects of a life that official records do not fully reveal.
Highlights
- Gossip travels fast in royal circles and lingers.
- I have known the story for over 30 years.
- That there was something going on between Prince Philip and Ferguson’s wife.
- It is quite untrue that there is any rift between the Queen and the Duke.
Royal gossip risks backlash and defamation concerns
The piece discusses an unverified claim about Prince Philip. Because it involves a member of the royal family, care must be taken to attribute claims clearly and avoid presenting them as proven fact. Readers should weigh the sources and be aware of potential reputational harm.
The royal narrative keeps turning, and the next chapter may come from another memory long kept in private circles.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

New book reveals Prince Andrew's marital affairs

American claims royal lineage from Queen Victoria

Yorks under scrutiny challenge royal image

Royal temper on Windsor road

Royal feud deepens after Meghan tears over William statement

Sturgeon memoir theme sparks royal privacy debate

Royal family anxious about Harry and Meghan's future plans

Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson's marriage complexities revealed
