favicon

T4K3.news

Rights groups urge suspension of Palestine Action prosecutions

Campaigners call for delaying prosecutions of Palestine Action supporters until the judicial review is complete.

August 15, 2025 at 10:02 AM
blur Palestine Action prosecutions should be suspended, say UK rights groups

Campaigners press the attorney general to pause prosecutions until the judicial review of the proscription is heard.

Rights groups urge suspension of Palestine Action prosecutions

Rights groups including Greenpeace UK, Friends of the Earth, Global Witness, Human Rights Watch and the Quakers have written to the attorney general, Richard Hermer KC, urging a pause on prosecutions linked to Palestine Action until a judicial review of the proscription is heard in November. They say continuing with charges before the ruling could raise significant legal and moral questions, and note that the attorney general decides how cases proceed under the Terrorism Act rather than the Crown Prosecution Service.

Last weekend 522 people were arrested under section 13 of the Terrorism Act at Parliament Square for carrying placards that stated I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action. The detentions pushed the total arrested under the act in relation to the group to more than 700 since it was proscribed last month. Separately, Liberal Democrats have written to Jonathan Hall KC asking him to urgently review the use of the Terrorism Act to arrest peaceful protesters in this context.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Rights groups urge delay of prosecutions
✔️
Judicial review of the proscription is set for November
✔️
Over 700 people arrested since the ban
✔️
Liberal Democrats request urgent review of Terrorism Act use
✔️
Prosecutions before review could raise legal and moral questions
✔️
The case tests balance between security and free expression
✔️
Official guidance centers on public interest in prosecution decisions

"Hundreds of people are facing potential prison sentences for sitting quietly holding placards."

Areeba Hamid of Greenpeace UK expressing concern.

"This could be a disproportionate restriction on people’s freedom of expression."

Areeba Hamid of Greenpeace UK speaking on the impact of the prosecutions.

"Proscription of Palestine Action was a disproportionate interference with human rights."

The joint letter from the signatory groups.

"Delay prosecutions until the judicial review concludes to avoid chaos in the courts."

Request to the attorney general in the same letter.

Taken together, the letters spotlight a broader debate about where security ends and free expression begins. By pressing the attorney general to delay, rights groups argue that rushed prosecutions risk legal overreach and a chilling effect on dissent.

The issue could redefine how Britain uses anti-terrorism powers in protests. If the judicial review curtails the proscription, prosecutions may be paused or dismissed; if not, the clash between public order and civil liberties could intensify.

Highlights

  • Hundreds of people are facing potential prison sentences for sitting quietly holding placards.
  • This could be a disproportionate restriction on people’s freedom of expression.
  • Proscription of Palestine Action was a disproportionate interference with human rights.
  • Delay prosecutions until the judicial review concludes to avoid chaos in the courts.

Political and legal risk over terrorism powers in protests

The use of Terrorism Act powers against peaceful Palestine Action protests raises questions about civil liberties, public reaction, and legal consistency ahead of a major judicial review.

The outcome will reveal how far the state will shield itself with broad powers while protecting protest rights.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News