Rangers backtrack on St Mirren postponement

Rangers backtracked on a St Mirren postponement amid claims Celtic influenced the move, signaling a tense week ahead in Scottish football.

Celtic Motive Behind Rangers St Mirren Postponement Triggers Backlash

Rangers asked to postpone their St Mirren game earlier this month to help navigate a tricky play-off push. They later withdrew the request, and reports say the reversal was prompted by Celtic rather than the Champions League timetable.

With Celtic four points ahead, postponing could have given Rodgers a bigger lead before a potential visit to Ibrox. Andy Walker suggested this is what unsettled Rangers, noting the prospect of Celtic arriving at Ibrox at the end of the month with a chance to stretch the gap further. Celtic then face a run of fixtures that could amplify momentum if results go their way.

The episode highlights how rivalry can bleed into calendar decisions and how public debate can shape perceptions of fairness in sport. It also foreshadows a period where league scheduling and media narratives may influence on field outcomes more than the matchday performances themselves.

This episode shows how deep rivalry can appear in even routine scheduling decisions. When the calendar becomes a tool in the title race, the line between football logic and strategic psychology blurs. The way this story is framed in clubs' motives matters as much as the games themselves, because perception feeds pressure on executives and players alike.

If this kind of dialogue continues, fans may demand greater transparency about how fixtures are set and postponed. A league that relies on clear rules and neutral decision making will be judged not only by results but by the trust it builds among supporters, sponsors and broadcasters.

Highlights

The calendar still has a long season to run, and how it is managed may define more than who wins on the day.