favicon

T4K3.news

Qantas faces A$90m penalty over pandemic layoffs

Australian Federal Court fines Qantas A$90m for illegally laying off about 1,700 ground staff during Covid-19

August 18, 2025 at 01:57 AM
blur Qantas fined A$90m for illegal layoffs during pandemic

Australia's largest airline was penalized for firing about 1,700 ground staff during the Covid-19 crisis.

Qantas fined 90 million for illegal pandemic layoffs

A Federal Court in Australia has ordered Qantas to pay A$90m for illegally dismissing around 1,700 ground workers during the Covid-19 pandemic. The ruling, delivered by Federal Court Justice Michael Lee, states the layoffs were unlawful and occurred as aviation demand collapsed. The Transport Workers' Union welcomed the decision, noting it as a strong deterrent against unlawful employer conduct. Qantas has not issued a public comment at the time of publication.

The case highlights how labor laws apply during emergencies and the duties on employers to follow due process before cutting staff. It also raises questions about how companies balance crisis management with worker protections and the potential ripple effects for other firms considering layoffs in downturns.

Key Takeaways

✔️
The penalty underscores the seriousness of unlawful layoffs
✔️
The layoffs occurred during the Covid crisis when operations were grounded
✔️
Unions welcomed the ruling as workplace protection
✔️
The case sets a precedent for future crisis layoffs
✔️
Qantas faces reputational and regulatory scrutiny beyond the fine
✔️
The decision emphasizes due process and worker protections
✔️
The ruling may influence how other firms handle crisis downsizing

"I want the fine to act as a real deterrence to other employers"

Judge Michael Lee's statement in the ruling

"This is a historic ruling that protects workers' rights"

Transport Workers' Union response

"The penalty sends a clear signal that accountability applies to big employers"

Editorial takeaway

The decision fits a broader pattern of courts asserting a clear standard for crisis layoffs. It signals that penalties, even when a company faces a survival challenge, must align with legal protections for workers. For Qantas, the financial hit is substantial, but the reputational and regulatory implications could linger longer than the cash cost. This ruling could influence how other airlines and large employers plan layoffs during shocks and may encourage more cautious consultation with unions and staff.

Highlights

  • Deterrence matters more than profit when people lose jobs
  • Workers deserve protection even in a crisis
  • The penalty sends a clear message about accountability
  • This is a landmark ruling for layoffs during a pandemic

Labor relations and public scrutiny risk

The case touches worker protections, union influence, and corporate governance. It could fuel debate and public scrutiny of how firms respond to crises, with potential policy implications.

The courtroom outcome will shape how big firms approach crisis decisions in the years ahead.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News