T4K3.news
Portsmouth asylum housing data gap
Hundreds of asylum seekers are housed in private HMOs in Portsmouth without council notification, prompting debate over oversight.

Portsmouth City Council discovers 55 HMOs housing at least 165 asylum seekers without notice, prompting questions about capacity and oversight.
Portsmouth faces strain as hundreds of asylum seekers housed in private rentals
Portsmouth City Council learned last week that 55 houses in multiple occupation are being used to shelter at least three asylum seekers each across the city, a minimum of 165 people. The council had told the Home Office it could not support additional asylum seekers, but the dispersal program had continued. Amanda Martin, the Labour MP for Portsmouth North, highlighted that the number of private rentals used for migrants had risen from 10 in 2019 to 58 by April 2024, a figure cited in a parliamentary inquiry and reported by The Times.
The Home Office confirmed it is expanding dispersal as part of a plan to reduce costly hotels and deliver a more sustainable asylum system. It said dispersal is being implemented in close consultation with local authorities to balance community needs and concerns. Portsmouth City Council said it was not notified about the decision to use private rentals and urged formal notification to a senior officer to avoid surprises and strain on local services.
Key Takeaways
"We were previously not aware of the number of properties being used in the city"
Portsmouth City Council on notification gaps
"We have made it clear that the processes [the Home Office] has are not adequate and they should be formally notifying a senior officer"
Council criticism of notification practices
"This approach is being implemented in close consultation with local authorities across the UK"
Home Office stance on dispersal
"The Government inherited an asylum system in chaos, with tens of thousands of asylum seekers stuck in the backlog being housed by the taxpayer"
Home Office framing of system challenges
This episode exposes a tension between national policy aims and local governance. The government’s dispersal strategy is meant to cut hotel costs and speed up decisions, but the lack of formal notification to the council risks misaligned planning and community tensions. Outsourcing housing to private operators raises questions about accountability and cost, especially when data gaps are exposed by MPs and in parliamentary inquiries. The episode also tests how quickly local authorities can adapt when decisions are made at a national level without timely local visibility.
Looking ahead, sustained transparency will be essential. If councils lack reliable data or a clear channel for notification, policy promises risk becoming public pressure. The government’s pledge to end asylum hotel use depends on delivering timely, well coordinated dispersal and robust oversight of private providers.
Highlights
- Data gaps put communities on the front line
- Transparency is essential when people are housed in private rentals
- Dispersal needs clear notification and coordination
- Open data sustains public trust in asylum policy
Budget strain and local backlash
The case in Portsmouth highlights how dispersal decisions interact with local resources and public sentiment. Without timely notifications, councils risk budget surprises and community tensions.
Public trust hinges on open data and accountable decisions.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Police will share suspects ethnicity and nationality

Channel crossings pass 50k milestone

UK faces rising fiscal deficit with urgent need for council tax reform

Waterlooville residents protest migrant housing plans

Migrant camp outside Paris City Hall demands housing

UK housing market gains after rate cuts

Jenrick under scrutiny over asylum hotels

Cornwall housing price map shows big regional gaps
