T4K3.news
Player seeks refund after 35,000 hours on Ark: Survival Evolved
A dedicated fan requests a refund despite extensive playtime of 35,000 hours following a game update.

A dedicated player of Ark: Survival Evolved is seeking a refund despite an incredible playtime.
Player demands refund after 35,000 hours in Ark: Survival Evolved
A player of Ark: Survival Evolved is asking for a refund after spending a staggering 35,000 hours on the game. This demand follows a recent update that disrupted their custom server, which utilized fan-made mods. Although Steam’s refund policy clearly states that refunds can only be requested within two weeks of purchase and after less than two hours of play, this user's case raises questions about fairness and consumer rights. While some players sympathize with the refund seeker, many others point out that requesting a refund after nearly four years of play time is unrealistic. The player cited technical issues with the update as the reason for the request and expressed frustration over being pushed towards a remastered version that they claim is inferior. The incident highlights the ongoing tensions between game developers and dedicated fans, especially in the sphere of digital purchases.
Key Takeaways
"I have that game as well, and it sucks."
The player expressed disappointment with the remaster of Ark: Survival Evolved, implying it's not a worthy replacement.
"In no world would you get a refund for anything you spend this much time on."
A fellow gamer criticized the refund demand, highlighting the unreasonable nature of the request after extensive play.
This unusual case reflects broader tensions in the gaming community, particularly concerning customer rights and expectations after years of investment in a game. As game updates occasionally alter gameplay experiences significantly, dedicated players face a dilemma when these changes affect their enjoyment. What happens when longtime fans feel alienated by new updates or changes in server functionality? While platforms like Steam have rules to prevent misuse of refund policies, this situation may prompt discussions about how companies could better address the needs and concerns of their loyal players without losing customer goodwill. It also challenges the perception of what constitutes fair use.
Highlights
- Claiming a refund after 35,000 hours may be a stretch.
- Investing years into a game should ring alarm bells for refund policies.
- Dedicated players deserve better than being pushed to a remaster.
- When updates create chaos, how do loyal fans react?
Potential Risks in Refund Demands
This incident raises questions about refund policies in digital gaming, highlighting the need for clearer guidelines between developers and dedicated players. The backlash against such refund requests may impact game developers and consumers alike.
Such incidents may prompt gaming companies to rethink how they handle customer satisfaction and community needs.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Player with 35,000 hours leaves negative Steam review

Explore the Best Games for Early Adopters

New studies explore sunlight benefits for health

Documentary Investigates Iconic Vietnam Photo Controversy

Mother survives severe sepsis thanks to boyfriend's warning

Liverpool considers contract changes for new player

New mastectomy guidelines proposed

Father loses both legs due to severe infection in Italy
