T4K3.news
Parade case expands with 24 new charges
Prosecutors add 24 charges to the Liverpool parade attack case, bringing the total to 31 as the court process continues.
Prosecutors add 24 new charges against Paul Doyle in connection with a parade attack in Liverpool.
Liverpool parade suspect faces 24 new charges
A man accused of driving into a crowd during Liverpool’s victory parade has had 24 new charges added to the case, taking the total to 31. Paul Doyle, of West Derby, appeared at Liverpool Crown Court by video link from prison. Prosecutors say the new indictment includes 17 counts of attempting to cause grievous bodily harm with intent, five counts of grievous bodily harm with intent, and one count of wounding with intent, along with a charge of affray. The incident on Water Street on May 26 injured more than 130 people, including five children. Doyle did not enter pleas to any charges as his barrister asked for more time to review the new counts. The defence has raised that it has not yet had time to read all new witness statements, and Doyle has requested a laptop to access CCTV and other digital evidence, a request that remains undecided two months on. A number of family members of those injured attended the hearing from the public gallery.
Key Takeaways
"Unknown Paul Doyle now faces 31 charges including causing grievous bodily harm with intent"
Charger update reported in court
"Mr Doyle had applied for a laptop while on remand in prison to enable him to view CCTV and other digital evidence"
Defense discussion on evidence access
"He became tearful as he was asked to confirm his identity"
Observed during appearance
"Simon Csoka told the court his client had only seen the detail of the new charges shortly before the hearing and had not had chance to read through new witness statements"
Defense statement about preparation
The rapid expansion of charges in this case shows how a single event can widen into a complex legal process. The mix of counts that target intent and harm raises questions about how quickly the justice system can respond while ensuring fair trial standards. The need for access to digital evidence highlights a broader tension between rapid case progression and proper preparation for the defence. At the same time, the presence of relatives in court underscores the personal toll of the incident and the ongoing demand for accountability.
Highlights
- Justice moves at its own pace when the city watches
- CCTV and questions travel faster than a verdict
- The case shows how quickly a crowd incident becomes a legal marathon
- A laptop to view CCTV is a right in a fair trial
High sensitive legal proceeding with victims involved
The case involves a large number of charges and injuries including children. It raises concerns about victim support, court efficiency, and access to digital evidence, which could lead to public reaction and debate about crowd safety at major events.
The courtroom will continue to shape how the city processes and responds to a high profile crowd incident.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News
Liverpool case update
Russia Builds a Wartime Edge
Man charged after Liverpool title parade crash
Tesla Diner opens amid excitement and protests
Buds 3 FE release signals price friendly option
Pixel 10 Series Preview
AirPods gain seven new features with iOS 26
Export policy sparks legal debate
