favicon

T4K3.news

Palace challenges CAS ruling on demotion

Crystal Palace attend a CAS hearing in Lausanne to overturn their demotion from the Europa League to the Conference League

August 8, 2025 at 07:21 AM
blur Steve Parish arrives for hearing in Switzerland as Crystal Palace attempt to have Europa League demotion overturned

Crystal Palace attend a Court of Arbitration for Sport hearing to overturn their demotion from the Europa League to the Conference League.

Palace fights CAS ruling on Europa League demotion

Crystal Palace arrived in Lausanne early for a Court of Arbitration for Sport hearing aimed at overturning their demotion from the Europa League to the Europa Conference League. Seven members of the club’s delegation, led by chairman Steve Parish, walked into the CAS building before the session began at 8 am GMT. Parish told reporters he expected a fair hearing and that the club would press its case, arguing UEFA’s ruling misapplied the rules on multi club ownership.

Palace were relegated after UEFA ruled that John Textor, who held a 43 percent stake and had influence at Selhurst Park, also owned Lyon, which took priority in that season’s standings. Textor has since sold his stake. Palace plan to argue that UEFA treated similar situations differently and they request UEFA remove either Lyon or Nottingham Forest from the competition. Nottingham Forest are sending legal representation to the hearing. The panel consists of three experienced members from different fields, and the process is expected to run into the afternoon with a verdict due on Monday.

Key Takeaways

✔️
The hearing tests whether UEFA rules on multi club ownership are applied uniformly
✔️
Palace argues that similar cases were treated differently by UEFA
✔️
A verdict is expected on Monday creating a short window of political and public reaction
✔️
The panel includes experts from different legal and sports backgrounds
✔️
Lyon’s link to Textor remains central to Palace’s appeal
✔️
Nottingham Forest are involved and will present their legal team
✔️
The case could reshape how linked ownership is regulated in European football

"Nice day for it"

Parish on arrival at the CAS hearing

"strong case"

Parish suggesting Palace would present a strong case

"fair hearing"

Parish hoping for a fair hearing in Switzerland

This case tests how football’s governing rules are applied when ownership links cross club borders. Palace’s insistence on possible double standards highlights a broader debate about fairness and consistency in sanctions. The panel’s composition a Swiss fencer, a Dutch lawyer and an Italian professor underlines how sport law operates with international expertise. Whatever the outcome, the decision will influence future disputes over ownership networks and regulatory reach across European competitions.

Highlights

  • Fair play means clear rules for every club
  • Consistency is the real prize in football governance
  • What happens at CAS will echo beyond this case
  • Ownership links should not buy silence from regulators

Risk of political backlash and investor scrutiny over multi club ownership

The case spotlights how linked ownership can invite criticism of fairness and transparency in European football. A ruling against Palace could trigger investor unease and public criticism; a ruling for Palace might provoke pushback from those who favor stricter ownership rules.

The ruling will reverberate beyond one club and one season, shaping governance norms for years to come.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News