favicon

T4K3.news

Nexon under fire over AI ads on TikTok

Nexon says it and TikTok are investigating questionable ads that used AI generated likenesses for The First Descendant.

August 18, 2025 at 02:43 PM
blur Nexon respond to claims they're using AI-generated Tiktok streamers to advertise The First Descendant

Nexon says it and TikTok are investigating questionable ads that use AI generated likenesses for The First Descendant.

Nexon Faces Backlash Over AI Generated TikTok Streamer Ads

South Korean publisher Nexon is probing a TikTok marketing push for The First Descendant after players highlighted ads showing AI like streamers praising the game. Nexon says a Creative Challenge allowed creators to submit content for ads and that TikTok checked all submissions for copyright before approval. However, some videos appear to feature artificial performers and altered mouths. Affected likenesses have drawn attention, including a streamer who said he did not consent.

The company faces questions about how much control it has over final ads, whether consent was obtained, and how much responsibility TikTok bears for the screening process. The incident follows earlier debates about copying real creators for marketing and the risks of outsourcing creative work to a platform that can approve questionable content. Industry watchers say this could undermine trust in influencer marketing, even as brands push to scale with AI tools.

Key Takeaways

✔️
AI likeness used without clear consent raises rights questions
✔️
Final ad approval may have rested with platform checks rather than brand controls
✔️
Nexon’s transparency on irregularities will influence public trust
✔️
TikTok screening processes may not catch consent or rights issues
✔️
A streamer publicly denying involvement underscores reputational risk for brands
✔️
Expect potential changes in influencer marketing rules and AI usage standards

"I have no affiliation nor contract with The First Descendant"

Streamer DanieltheDemon denies involvement and alleges unauthorized use of his likeness

"They stole my face/reactions from my most viral video and used AI to change what my mouth says and a voice that isn't mine. I did not consent for my likeness to be used"

Streamer DanieltheDemon describes alleged misuse of his likeness

"We would like to inform you of certain irregularities identified in the operation of our TikTok Creative Challenge"

Nexon acknowledges irregularities and ongoing joint investigation with TikTok

This case highlights a clash between fast, scalable marketing and clear ethical lines. Outsourcing ads to platforms and using AI to simulate faces creates a slippery slope for brand trust. The risk is not only a single apology but lasting damage to Nexon’s image and to creators who fear misuse of their likeness. Regulators and platform guidelines may tighten the rules around consent and automated content, changing how campaigns are built in the future.

Highlights

  • Faces belong to real creators not algorithms
  • Consent is the new brand metric in an AI age
  • Outsourcing ads to a platform risks brand safety
  • Trust erodes when consent and oversight lag behind innovation

AI likeness and consent risk in marketing

The incident raises concerns about consent, rights to likeness and how ads pass through platform screening, potentially harming Nexon and creators.

As the investigation unfolds, the industry will watch how Nexon handles consent, oversight, and accountability.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News