favicon

T4K3.news

NatWest funds linked to Ponzi scheme during police probe

Bank records show NatWest continued processing investor money for 79th Group after a fraud inquiry was announced.

August 10, 2025 at 11:01 PM
blur NatWest still took funds for ‘Ponzi scheme’ during police inquiry

Investors continued to send money to 79th Group through NatWest even after police announced a fraud investigation.

NatWest processed funds for Ponzi scheme amid police inquiry

NatWest processed more than £100 million for 79th Group through its main account, even after City of London Police announced in February that they were investigating a suspected widespread fraud. Transaction records seen by The Times show investor funds arriving as late as March 17 this year. The 79th Group has since collapsed, raising fears that investors may have lost life savings. ING warned in November that the NatWest account for 79th Group was known to ING as an account used in scam cases.

The Times investigation underscores questions about how banks monitor suspicious money flows and the speed with which warnings are acted on. It highlights the tension between warning signals and action, and it points to broader concerns about investor protection in complex financial schemes.

Key Takeaways

✔️
NatWest processed over £100 million for 79th Group during the police investigation
✔️
ING had previously flagged the main NatWest account as linked to scams
✔️
Investors may have continued funding the scheme after warnings
✔️
The case highlights gaps in bank monitoring of suspicious fund flows
✔️
Regulators could push for tighter anti money laundering controls
✔️
Public trust in financial safeguards may be affected by the findings

"Banks must act faster when red flags appear"

Editorial reaction to delayed scrutiny in the case

"Investors deserve clarity not silence"

Reflection on impact on savers

"Protecting savers means tougher monitoring"

Call for stronger controls after the case

This case exposes gaps in how banks detect and respond to red flags in real time. It suggests that even when warnings exist, money can flow through accounts long enough to cause damage before safeguards tighten. Regulators will likely face renewed pressure to review AML controls and bank monitoring practices, aiming to reduce the chance that funds are funneled into fraudulent schemes. The episode may also influence how the public views the responsibility of lenders in preventing consumer losses.

Highlights

  • Banks must act faster when red flags appear
  • Investors deserve clarity not silence
  • Protecting savers means tougher monitoring
  • Trust in finance hinges on decisive action

Financial and regulatory risk from ongoing investigation

The piece highlights potential losses for investors, reputational risk for NatWest and ING, and a push for tighter bank monitoring and AML controls as authorities scrutinize how such funds flowed through accounts.

The coming weeks will reveal how quickly safeguards tighten and who bears the cost of stalled protections.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News