T4K3.news
Liam Gallagher misinformed about Oasis fans remarks
Edinburgh Council says reports of council officers' comments about Oasis fans were not said; Liam Gallagher disputes the claims amid a major three night run at Murrayfield.

The city’s council leader says reports of comments about Oasis fans were not said by council officers and Liam Gallagher disputed their accuracy.
Council leader says Liam Gallagher misinformed about Oasis fans remarks
Edinburgh’s council leader says Liam Gallagher was misinformed about remarks attributed to council officers regarding Oasis fans. Gallagher had complained on stage that reports described fans as rowdy and ready to drink, and the comments were said to have come before the Murrayfield concerts. The three-night run drew about 210,000 fans and delivered a sizable economic impact through spending, transport usage, and related activity, while officials noted a small number of arrests.
Council leader Jane Meagher told STV News that the statements were not made by council officers in any meeting and urged the city to move past the dispute. She said the planning process did consider public order in relation to intoxication levels, and she emphasised that the money generated does not flow directly to the council, even as the city benefits. Meagher added that Oasis would be welcome back to Edinburgh.
Key Takeaways
"£3bn we’ve brought into this city over the past five days. And that’s between you and us."
Gallagher on stage defending the economic impact of the visits.
"Nobody talked about drunk fans, nobody talked about that."
Meagher clarifying the reports about comments.
"Having experienced Oasis here and the excitement, I would absolutely love it if they come back to Edinburgh."
Meagher expressing openness to future Oasis shows.
"It’s been a fantastically successful event and we’re very pleased about the effect it’s had on the city’s economy."
Meagher on the economic impact of the concerts.
Beyond the clash, the episode shows how culture and city governance intersect in real time. When a global act arrives, the story quickly becomes a matter of reputation as well as revenue. The miscommunication underscores how quickly narratives form around fans, safety, and money, and it highlights the importance of clear, data driven dialogue between artists and officials.
The episode also raises questions about who benefits from big events. A large visitor footprint and strong spending can revitalize streets and transit, but the public purse may not capture a proportional share. The city now faces a test in how it communicates with residents and visitors about the reality of the impact, while keeping the momentum for future gigs intact.
Highlights
- Stage lights can’t outshine the citys receipts
- Money flows from gigs when trust stays intact
- Crowds bring life but planning keeps it safe
- A city needs clarity as fame meets local governance
Political and public reaction risk around statements
The clash over reported comments touches local government credibility and public sentiment, with potential backlash from fans and critics. The financial context raises questions about the city's economic gains from events and how they are shared.
City life thrives on big nights, but trust keeps the encore possible.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Susan Boyle responds to Oasis tribute

Oasis return to Dublin with big hits after 16 years

Oasis rebukes Edinburgh Council over fan safety talk

Oasis headline at Murrayfield shown with selective setlist

Oasis reunion tour begins with drone show in Edinburgh

Oasis concert draws attention with royal jab

Liam Gallagher welcomes all to Oasis concerts

Oasis sets attendance record at Wembley
