favicon

T4K3.news

Kohli faces trial over alleged indecent assaults

Hardeep Singh Kohli appeared at Glasgow sheriff court denying three indecent assault charges, one sexual assault and two breaches of the peace related to events between 2007 and 2016, including at BBC Studios.

August 8, 2025 at 12:15 PM
blur Hardeep Singh Kohli ‘indecently assaulted woman at BBC studio’

An editorial analysis of charges against Hardeep Singh Kohli and their implications for trust in media and due process.

Kohli faces trial over alleged indecent assaults

Hardeep Singh Kohli, 56, appeared at Glasgow sheriff court to face three indecent assault charges, one sexual assault and two breaches of the peace. The allegations cover a period from April 2007 to December 2016 and include an incident at BBC Studios in Pacific Quay, Glasgow. Kohli has denied all charges.

Known for television work on programs such as The One Show and appearances at the Edinburgh Fringe, Kohli's case places a spotlight on how media figures are treated when serious claims surface. The proceedings raise questions about safeguarding, workplace culture, and how organisations respond to complaints while respecting due process.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Charges span a long period from 2007 to 2016
✔️
Kohli pleads not guilty and a trial will determine guilt
✔️
Alleged incident at BBC Studios is part of the case
✔️
The case raises questions about safeguarding and accountability in media
✔️
Media coverage must balance transparency with due process
✔️
Public trust in institutions may be affected by the outcome
✔️
The BBC faces scrutiny over internal handling of complaints

"Trust is earned in quiet work not loud headlines"

editorial takeaway on accountability

"Due process should guide every step not speculation"

legal standards in coverage

"Accountability must reach every corner of the media world"

industry wide implications

"Victims deserve safety and a fair hearing"

victim support in coverage

The case tests how audiences balance accountability with the presumption of innocence for public figures. It also pushes media organisations to examine internal safeguards and reporting practices when staff or guests are accused. The outcome could influence newsroom norms and how courts weigh allegations when public figures are involved.

If the trial proceeds, the results may shape trust in media institutions, victim protections, and the handling of misconduct across the sector. The attention drawn to this case highlights broader issues of consent, workplace safety, and the responsibilities of broadcasters to maintain safe spaces for staff and guests.

Highlights

  • Trust is earned in quiet work not loud headlines
  • Due process should guide every step not speculation
  • Accountability must reach every corner of the media world
  • Victims deserve safety and a fair hearing

Backlash risk in high profile allegations

The case involves sensitive allegations against a public figure tied to a major broadcaster. Coverage may provoke public reaction and debates about due process safeguarding and trust in media institutions.

Time will reveal how institutions strengthen safeguards without compromising fairness

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News