favicon

T4K3.news

Judkins not charged in Florida case

Prosecutors in Broward County declined to file a misdemeanor battery charge against Browns rookie Quinshon Judkins after reviewing records in a July incident.

August 14, 2025 at 08:48 PM
blur Browns' Quinshon Judkins won't face formal battery charge

Prosecutors in Broward County decline to file a misdemeanor battery charge after reviewing police reports and supporting material.

Browns' Quinshon Judkins won't face formal battery charge

Prosecutors in Broward County declined to file a misdemeanor battery charge against Browns rookie Quinshon Judkins after reviewing police reports, body-worn camera video, surveillance footage, photos, phone records, and the sworn statement of a woman involved. The decision notes there were no independent witnesses and videos available in the same time frame did not clearly show injuries. The delay in reporting is listed as a factor in the review.

Judkins was arrested on July 12 in Fort Lauderdale on a misdemeanor domestic violence and battery charge. Authorities say the incident happened five days before the arrest but was reported later. The decline memorandum also points out that the victim’s injuries shown in photos could be explained by different accounts. The NFL says it is following developments while Judkins remains unsigned and Browns officials have been cautious about public statements as contract talks continue.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Prosecutors decline to file a charge after review
✔️
There were no independent witnesses to the incident
✔️
Videos in the relevant period did not independently confirm injuries
✔️
The report was filed long after the incident occurred
✔️
The NFL is monitoring the situation
✔️
Judkins remains unsigned and contract talks proceed
✔️
Public reaction could influence team decisions and sponsor concerns

"There are no independent witnesses to the incident."

From the decline memorandum stating lack of witnesses.

"There is no reasonable likelihood of conviction."

From the decline memorandum explaining the charge decision.

"The incident was not captured on any video surveillance."

From the decline memorandum noting lack of video evidence.

"The league has been following developments in the matter."

Statement from an NFL spokesperson.

The case highlights how prosecutors weigh evidence when the record is mixed and video proof is missing. A delayed report and lack of independent witnesses can tilt the balance toward not charging, even with an alleged injury. For the Browns, this removes a potential legal obstacle before Judkins reaches the field, but it also shifts focus to how teams handle players facing domestic-violence questions during rookie negotiations. The broader issue is how the league and teams balance talent with accountability while public scrutiny remains high.

Highlights

  • There are no independent witnesses to the incident.
  • There is no reasonable likelihood of conviction.
  • The incident was not captured on video surveillance.
  • The league has been following developments in the matter.

Public reaction risk around Judkins case

The decision not to charge may limit immediate legal consequences, but it could fuel public scrutiny of how domestic violence cases are handled and affect sponsor perceptions.

The next chapter will show how the league, the Browns and Judkins navigate talent, accountability and public trust.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News